Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />April 11, 1994 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />relating to the cost of the improvement project. Person <br />stated that the materials testing process, overhead <br />items, and extra items needed in the field, historically <br />were not included in the initial packet from the Engineer <br />(Maier Stewart). She further noted to refer to a memo <br />faxed to her that day from the Engineer that explained <br />the cost differential. These additional cost items were <br />included in the contractor's specifications and <br />therefore, included in the total bid price. <br /> <br />Malone commented that since there is a slight increase in <br />the cost as outlined in the contractor's bid, he would <br />recommend a rate of $10.25 for the cold-in-place <br />recycling project, and a rate of $29.50 for the <br />reconstruction project to reflect the slightly higher <br />cost for the improvements. He further noted that this <br />would be allowed as outlined in the assessment manual. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Malone to approve <br />Resolution #94-31, establishing the assessment rates <br />to be $10.25 for the cold-in-place recycling project <br />and $29.50 for the reconstruction project in the <br />matter of the 1994 Pavement Management Improvement <br />project. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />REOUEST FROM THOMAS GOSERUD. ARDEN SILLS NURSERY <br />TO ~IVE FEE ASSOCIATED WITH REOUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. <br /> <br />Probst referred to a letter received in the packet from <br />Mr. Goserud outlining his reasons for the request to <br />waive the fee associated with the Special Use Permit. <br />Probst asked Mr. Goserud if he had anything to add that <br />had not already been mentioned in the letter. Mr. <br />Goserud stated he had nothing further to add at that <br />time. <br /> <br />Malone commented that as part of the Special Use Permit <br />function, fees are involved to cover attorney costs, <br />publications and other related expenses. He further <br />noted that the actual cost would be higher as staff's <br />time was not calculated in the fee schedule. These fees <br />help to cover the costs in maintaining the general order <br />of City Hall. . <br /> <br />Aplikowski noted that she would support refunding the <br />fee, and staff should review the rules in the application <br />fee procedures. She stated that as City rules change, the <br />City should notify all parties possibly affected by the <br />change. <br /> <br />Hicks asked whether similar situations of that nature had <br />previously been brought before the staff, and whether the <br />