Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />.e <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />Ie <br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />May 9, 1994 <br /> <br />Probst asked the applicant, Mr. Carlson, how much time <br />was needed to test the equipment. Mr. Carlson stated <br />they need thirty days to complete cell site testing. <br /> <br />Probst asked the applicant if he attended the June <br />Planning Commission meeting, would that allow enough time <br />to complete the testing process. He further noted the <br />case could then be heard at the June 13 City Council <br />meeting. The applicant answered that this is not <br />sufficient time to fully test and prepare for <br />installation. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski to allow the <br />applicant, Cellular One, to proceed with the needed <br />changes to the antenna based on the conditions <br />allowed through the lease agreement, while pursuing <br />the Special Use Permit process. Motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />JOB EVALUATION SYSTEM UPDATE - PAY EOUITY <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Administrator Person commented that she recommended that <br />the City Council authorize the use of PDI for the pay <br />equity study based on the lower price quote of $4,515, as <br />well as, their use of additional baseline job <br />descriptions over Hay Associates. She further noted that <br />PDI would conduct job reviews with the management staff. <br /> <br />Malone noted that based on personal experience, he would <br />recommend that the City Council consider using the <br />services of Hay Associates. He further noted that Hay <br />Associates had been in the business longer and he had <br />good experiences working with this firm. <br /> <br />Mayor Sather commented that MTC had used Hay Associates. <br /> <br />Person noted that PDI seemed to be more flexible and <br />their process seemed easier to work with, and received <br />positive recommendations on PDI. <br /> <br />Hicks asked why there was a cost difference between Hay <br />Associates and PDI. Hay Associates low end cost was less <br />than PDI, however, it could be higher by the end of the <br />study. Person noted Hay Associates anticipated the <br />approximate time that would be needed to complete the <br />study, however, depending on how much time would be spent <br />with the staff could fluctuate, and in turn, additional <br />costs could be billed for the service to a maximum of <br />$6,000. <br />