CC 05-23-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . .e . . . . . . .e . . . . . . . .e . Arden Hills Council 12 May 23, 1994 specifically require a pool but that it was offered as part of the SUP. Mayor Sather asked that if the park dedication was at the 10% requirement, at that time, has the Park dedication ever been satisfied? Attorney Filla indicated that the City could even now require the 10% park dedication. Instead of 6.5 acres of land actually set aside, the approximate value of 6.5 acres could be discussed with the owner. Another dedication in lieu of the land is also possible; cash payment or another condition could be added to show conformance to the SUP regarding park dedication. Hicks stated that at the Planning Commission meeting the residents said they can't use the ball field and other parts of the recreation areas because of the drainage and flooding of the park. He also indicated that there should be a fair amount of park land that can be used since there is a dense population and kids need a safe place to play. MOTIONl Probst moved, Hicks seconded to deny the amendment to the special use permit to #75-6, case #94-07, Arden Manor Mobile Home Park, that the owner secure any hazards or provide alternative recreation uses. The owner is asked to appear at the meeting of June 27, 1994 to review the swimming pool upkeep and any associated hazards. Motion carried unanimously. Further discussion by Council indicated that the existing 3.5 acre easement is a part of a package to satisfy the park dedication. There needs to be some work done by park owners to alleviate the problems of drainage. He suggested that if there is not sufficient room for additional park items, then the owner can address the issue in a different manner, as suggested by the attorney. The applicant was represented by Park Manager Tom