My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-13-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CC 06-13-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:44 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:24:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I, <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN IJTJ.T .l:l CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 13, 1994 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Mayor Sather noted that the Planning Commission is not meeting until July, and by <br />consensus of the Council it was agreed to postpone tilling vacancies to the next <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION STATUS <br /> <br />Mayor Sather stated that considerable time has been spent deliberating the status of <br />the Human Rights Commission over the last several Council work sessions. At one <br />time the City was required by stale law to have a Human Rights Commission. That <br />requirement is no longer in effect. The Council has discussed changing the <br />commission to a committee that would serve at the pleasure of the Council. The <br />question to be decided is whether to take formal action to abolish the Human Rights <br />Commission and reinstate it as a committee. <br /> <br />Probst stated that he has had the opportunity to serve as Council liaison to that <br />commission, and it is appropriate to redefine its role. With the changes in state <br />statutes regarding mediation of human rights cases, the need no longer exists for this <br />commission to continue as a statutory commission of the City. He recommended that <br />the City Administrator submit a formalized resolution for Council approval. <br /> <br />MOTION: rocks moved, seconded by Malone to adopt Resolution No. 94-38. Motion <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS TRAFFIC SIGN POLICY <br /> <br />Mayor Sather stated that the proposed traffic sign policy would formalize a procedure <br />for traffic signs. When residents express concern about various intersections or <br />traffic problems, a process would be in place to pursue the issue. <br /> <br />Probst stated that the proposed policy reflects ideas from prior discussion of the City <br />Council and the Public Works Committee, who solidly supports the policy. It defines <br />a clear process for adding or removing a traffic sign. <br /> <br />MOTION: Probst moved, seconded by Malone to adopt the Traffic Sign Policy as <br />presented. <br /> <br />Discussion: Malone stated that the policy addresses locations where traffic signs are <br />required by law. In order to put up a traffic sign, the location must meet state <br />criteria that warrant it, which can be very stringent. He asked if a certain <br />location does not meet the warrants, would that mean automatic denial for <br />'placement of a traffic si~. <br /> <br />Winkel responded that the City can evaluate each situation, and there are <br />sometimes special circumstances for exceptions to be made to the rule. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.