My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-27-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CC 06-27-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:44 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 27, 1994 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />a Boundary Line Agreement with the neighbor to the east has been reached to <br />minimize the variance request. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />SITE PLAN REVIEW - RAMADA - PLANNING CASE NO. 94-10 <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that in 1993, the City approved an outdoor patio for the Ramada Inn <br />adjacent to McGuire's. Approval was subject to several conditions and a one-year <br />review period. The applicant has now requested approval for the patio with one <br />additional condition, which would be to eliminate ~e sidewalk required along the <br />south side. The sidewalk Was primarily included to help delineate fire lanes. The <br />existing sidewalk on the east side ends at the front entry, and there is also a small <br />sidewalk on the west side. A sidewalk on the south would not connect to either of the <br />existing sidewalks. In checking with the Fire Chief and Code Enforcement Officer, a <br />sidewalk would not be required if the fire lane is adequately identified. Recently the <br />parking lot was completed with asphalt and restriping. The landscaping requirement <br />will be done as part of a change in franchise from Ramada Inn to Holiday Inn. Staff <br />has found no documentation of concern or complaint regarding the patio proposal and <br />recommended approval to the Planning Commission with the exclusion of item No. B, <br />a sidewalk on the south side. After a lengthy discussion, the Planning Commission <br />approved the site plan, subject to the conditions listed in the Planning Commission <br />minutes of June I, 1994, on page 16. <br /> <br />Probst asked if the landscaping would be done on work that is approved but not <br />proceeding. <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that the Planning Commission did not discuss that issue. They <br />stipulated that the landscaping plan be submitted to the City by September I, 1994. <br /> <br />Aplikowski asked if that is a realistic deadline with the changeover in management. <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that Planning Commissioners asked the same question, and the <br />applicant has stated that the improvements can be completed by September I, 1994. <br /> <br />MOTION: Probst moved, seconded by Aplikowski to approve Planning Case No. 94-10 <br />for an outdoor patio at the Ramada Inn, subject to the conditions outlined by <br />the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> <br />As a point of information, Person referred Councilmembers to the report on street <br />improvement prepaid assessments that was included in the Council packet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.