Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />Worksession Minutes <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />July 21, 1994 <br /> <br />the area of Arden Hills. The Army to this point has also been involved; they have been very <br />cooperative and open to various ideas but there will be restrictions. <br /> <br />Malone felt that someone with some authority and who can act for the City, needs to be in close <br />contact with this community group. With the City being an active participant in the process, more <br />staff time and support will be required. Council agreed Probst should continue City efforts with <br />Staff support for the time being. <br /> <br />AMBLE DRIVE STORM SEWER: <br />Council had discussed earlier, the issue of diverting storm water drainage from Karth Lake. An <br />estimate of $70,000 had been received from MSA stating this would be the cost to replace the <br />storm sewer drainage from Amble Drive to Pleasant Drive. If the project was just to replace the <br />piping that is currently at Amble Drive, the cost would be about $27,500. Staff reported also that <br />minutes from the 5/27/86 Council Meeting that stated that this neighborhood would be <br />responsible for controlling the storm water run-off into the Lake either through pumping or some <br />other method of control that they felt comfortable with. <br /> <br />Malone was not convinced that storm run-off from Amble Drive and Pleasant Drive raises the <br />level ofKarth Lake to a noticeable level. There was discussion about the need for a lift station to <br />handle the level of the lake. Malone believes it takes alot of water to get the water level up to <br />affect even the lift stations, but if there is interest in this idea, those interested should contact City <br />Hall. He also added that there seems to be confusion or misunderstanding about what the 1986 <br />minutes say on this issue. It was suggested that Staff put together a letter from the Mayor to this <br />neighborhood group regarding the City's position and include information from the May 1986 <br />minutes. Dan Wmke~ Public Works Superintendent said that he would have this letter prepared <br />for the Mayor's signature and out to this group by July 27. <br /> <br />ANIMAL CONTROL: <br />The discussion on Anima1 Control Ordinance began in March, 1994 and a request from the <br />Association of Dog Owners to review the kennel requirement was the result. Rick Ruzicka, the <br />Anima1 Control Officer for the City of Arden Hills and Brian Fritsinger, Community Planning <br />Coordinator both have reviewed the current City ordinance. The primary issue seems to be the <br />number of dogs a resident can have. Staffhas recommended that a 1imit be set at three dogs per <br />household kennel but the Council of Dog Owners felt this limitation is too strict. They feel that it <br />unfairly penalizes those residents that have hobby kennels and they want the allowance of six <br />adult dogs. In researching this ordinance, Brian reported that originally, the Zoning Code allowed <br />only two dogs per household kennel. <br /> <br />Bev Aplikowski asked about puppies; whether they are addressed in the ordinance. Ruzicka said <br />that puppies should be allowed to stay with the mother until they are three months but after that <br />time they are able to leave the mother. If they are allowed to stay longer, typically they become a <br />