Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />Worksession Minutes <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />July 21, 1994 <br /> <br />are afraid of getting in each other's way. When asked about an impounding fee, Ruzicka said that <br />he is not charging one as a fee was never established. It was agreed that the Council will go with <br />Staff recommendation. Ruzicka said that the average rate is between $15 - $25, with $25 being <br />closer to the average. He advised against setting the rate too high as owners won't pick up the <br />dog or cat. Mayor Probst asked how many dogs are impounded in a year. Ruzicka responded <br />that last year, he impounded 16 dogs. This year that number is less; he's having more of a <br />problem with cats. Mayor Probst said he doesn't want the fee to be revenue generating, but wants <br />the fee set so that the City can recover the costs ofkeeping an animal. Aplikowski asked if the <br />fee would be the same for cats; Ruzicka suggested that it should be the same for dogs and cats. <br />Mayor Probst said that he wants the fee to be in line with other communities; likes the idea. of <br />having a "sliding scale" fee. The impounding fee would increase each time the same animal is <br />picked up. <br /> <br />Both Malone and Aplikowski agreed that there is a need for a licensing fee that also would <br />include cats. Ruzicka suggested a licensing fee oUIO to run from December to December. The <br />Council agreed to change the current two year $15 year license to the one year $10 license for <br />both cat and dogs. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst said that in order to amend the Zoning Code to fix the number of dogs allowed in a <br />household, a Public Hearing is required. He would like to take care of all of these issues taken <br />care of at one meeting. (That meeting has yet to be determined.) <br /> <br />BUDGET: <br /> <br />Terry Post reported that the prt.1iminaryI995 budget represents an earlier direction of "holding the <br />line" from Council. The Staff's budget as presented represents an increase of2.5%. City <br />AdminiAtrator Person reported that there are no major changes in the Mayor/Council budget <br />except: <br /> <br />a. Community Survey - $13,000 <br />b. Elections - $2,500 in case a referendum is presented in 1995 <br />c. Legal - costs continue to increase despite attempts by Staff to limit use. <br />d. Sheriff - (3. 7"10 increase) Primary factors are: <br />I. Insurance - looking for reduction in workers' compensation, <br />personal protection and vehicle under MCIT. This reduction may <br />amount to several thousand do1Iars. <br /> <br />2. Rice Creek Corridor - Five cities required more coverage last year. <br />As a result, Arden Hills may see an increase of2% in 1996. There <br />will be no increase for 1995. <br /> <br />e. Fire Department - CbiefDan Wmkel reported that the cost to the City will <br />remain the same. There may be a 1% - 2% drop in capital expenditures; <br />operating costs will be the same. <br />