My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-26-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CC 09-26-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:45 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCll. - SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 297: AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 18. ARDEN <br />HILLS CITY CODE <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that this item is in regard to Section 18, Transient Merchants and Peddling. Earlier <br />this year, in the process of amending this ordinance, the City Attorney recommended that further <br />clarification be made in the ordinance. One recommendation was to define transient merchant and <br />identi1Y specifically where they are allowed to do business. The following sections have been revised: <br />Section 18-14(a) provides consistent changes of the word practices to signs. Section 18-14(d) clearly <br />states that open sales lots are not allowed within the City of Arden Hills. The other reason for <br />amending the full chapter of the ordinance is to make certain that it is consistent with the Municipal <br />Code Book. He recommended the Council adopt the Ordinance 297, including the proposed <br />amendments of Chapter 18, as recommended by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 297 to amend <br />Chapter 18 of the City Code. The motion was IInanimously approved (4-0). <br /> <br />CASE 94-22 - SITE PLAN REVIEW AND LOT CONSOLIDATION - ST. VOLODYMYR & <br />ST. OLGA UKRAINIAN ORmODOX CHURCH REOUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that the applicant is requesting a special use pennit to operate a house of worship <br />in an R-I district. A house of worship is allowed in the R-I zoning district through a special use <br />pennit. Submitted for Council's consideration is the site plan for the church and lot consolidation of <br />the property reviewed and approved by the City (Case No. 90-11). There has been a delay in the <br />construction, and the ordinance requires that the applicant have the project reviewed again. The <br />P1anning Commkqion did review and unanimously approved the lot consolidation, site plan and SUP. <br />The proposal has been scaled down from the one presented in 1990. In 1990, the City encouraged <br />the applicant to acquire an adjacent single family residence property, which the church has done and <br />is including in the lot consolidation. The property now consists of approximately 4.8 acres. <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that City regulations require 65% of the property to be landscaped, and this plan <br />shows 64+%. Church officials are working with staff to achieve more landscaping and reduce <br />parking spaces. The area is fairly level and wooded with many mature trees. Under the landscaping <br />plan, the site would require approximately 43.5 caliper inches of landscaping. The applicant is <br />planning a number of plantings in the plaza. A black spruce is planned for the entrance area, and <br />Norway pines were added to the southwest comer to comply with the 43.5 caliper inch requirement. <br />City Code allows 35 feet of height for a structure. When the domes and spires are completed on the <br />church, it will be 90 feet in height. There is an exemption clause in the ordinance for church spires <br />so these will be in compliance. There is a delineated wetland on the site and some encroachment. <br />Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plan and issued a permit to allow the encroachment. <br />The City Engineer has also reviewed the plan and stated that other than the drainage easements, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.