Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 <br />'Page 6 <br /> <br />KEM MILLING (Cont'd) Filla advised the property owner is not interested in <br />sharing the cost of the environmental audit, nor would <br />they be interested in paying more than one-half of the taxes payable in 1989. He <br />stated if the City acquires the property this year the property would be <br />tax-exempt in 1990; the cost in 1989 would be approximately $7,500.00. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator Berger reported briefly on the quotes received from three <br />firms for the environmental audit. <br /> <br />There was discussion relative to extension of the dates that the proposal would <br />remain valid, closing and purchase of the property; Council and Attorney Filla <br />expressed concern that the Phase I results from the environmental audit may not <br />be received prior to the date listed in the agreement. Filla advised this problem <br />was not anticipated and suggested the dates be extended. <br /> <br />Rolfe Warden, Attorney for Darling & Company, stated it appears the timing is <br />right and there is sufficient time to receive the results of the preliminary <br />audit. <br /> <br />After further discussion, the attorneys and Council agreed to amend the dates of <br />the agreement to coincide with the dates of the regularly scheduled Council <br />meetings and to allow sufficient time for the environmental audit results to be <br />reviewed by Council. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Malone, that Council approve <br />the proposed Purchase Agreement between Darling & Company and the City of Arden <br />Hills, and authorize the Mayor and Clerk Administrator to execute the Agreement <br />... and supplement to the proposed purchase agreement, subject to the following: <br /> <br />1. Date of Closing to be changed from May 10, 1989 to June 12, 1989. <br />2. Date of Notice of Termination from April 27, 1989 to May 30, 1989. <br />3. Changes in dates to be reflected in amended paragraphs on proposed purchase <br />agreement; or be means of a separate supplement. <br /> <br />Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />EVIRON. AUDIT; <br />KEM MILLING SITE <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated <br />4-10-89, regarding three quotes received to conduct an <br />environmental audit at the Kem Milling site. <br /> <br />Berger advised the first phase of the audit will identify any hazardous materials <br />in the building that will need to be disposed of separately from the demolition; <br />pending the results of Phase I, Phases II and III may not be needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone noted the quote from Braun does not include asbestos <br />testing. In reviewing the quote from Delta, Phase II of their proposal would <br />include asbestos testing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Growe, that Council direct the <br />Clerk Administrator to enter into an agreement with Delta Environmental <br />Consultants to conduct Phase I and the parts deemed necessary of Phase II, of the <br />environmental audit of the KEM Milling site, and specific that Phase I of the <br />audit be completed and results returned to Council by May 24, 1989. Motion <br />carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />LEASE AGREEMENT; <br />CELLULAR ONE <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated <br />4-7-89, relative to the proposed Cellular One Water Tower <br />Lease Agreement. <br /> <br />Acting Attorney Filla reviewed the amendments to the agreement and referred <br />Council to his letter dated 4-5-89, which outlines the changes requested by the <br />Attorney representing Cellular One in his correspondence of 3-28-89. Filla <br />advised the following three items were not inserted in the draft agreement: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. The Telephone Company requested rental adjustments be maximized at 20% <br />per rental terms, as opposed to a straight comparison to the increase in the cost <br />of living index over the same period of time. <br />2. The Telephone Company would like paragraph 6(e) to permit immediate access <br />by the Telephone Company in the event of an emergency or equipment failure. <br />3. The Telephone Company would like to add paragraph 16 (h) which indicates <br />that as long as the Telephone Company is attempting to cure any defaults with due <br />diligence, the time for curing the default will be extended until the Telephone <br />Company remedies the situation. <br />