My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-07-23 JDA
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Minutes
>
2023
>
08-07-23 JDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2024 4:19:18 PM
Creation date
2/2/2024 4:19:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with density without proper consideration of schools, pollution, traffic, funding or proper order. <br />She indicated the urgency was mentioned over and over by Commissioner Reinhardt. She <br />questioned if everything was being done outside of public view. She stated as a former lawyer, <br />she reminded the JDA that Ramsey County sued the City for more density and not the other <br />way around. She requested the financial woes of Ramsey County noted be solved on the backs <br />of Arden Hills residents. She discussed how taxes went up in Ramsey County in 2023 and noted <br />this was linked to the loss of income from commercial properties in the County. She again <br />questioned how this was a problem of Arden Hills residents. She understood that things have <br />changed, but urged the JDA to slow down and do things well. She discussed the diversity and <br />density surrounding TCAAP noting North Heights Church would be building new units, along <br />with the city of Mounds View. She worried how traffic in this area would be impacted. She <br />understood the JDA hoped to receive funding from an inflation reduction act. She worried the <br />City would bond itself to death through this project and she did not want this forced upon <br />Arden Hills residents. She reported the density has to be reconsidered given the fact there were <br />still concerns regarding traffic, pollution, finances, livability and greenspaces. She reported a <br />clean, sustainable project could not be done the way it was being pursued now. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund stated there will be times questions are raised and responses to these questions <br />will be found under the FAQ portion of the Rice Creek Commons website or information will be <br />provided on a future agenda. <br /> <br />Consent Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Old Business <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />New Business <br /> <br />a. Update on Communications <br /> <br />Director Collins stated Sara Swenson from Goff Public would be leaving on maternity leave very <br />shortly and an individual from Goff Public would be filling in in her absence. She then discussed <br />how Goff Public has been working with Ramsey County to solidify the communications <br />infrastructure for the Rice Creek Commons microsite, including finalizing the FAQ on the <br />website, which has now been posted. One person submitted an inquiry through the microsite <br />contact portal, which Ella Mitchell from Ramsey County was able to respond to. Additionally,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.