My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-07-23 JDA
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Minutes
>
2023
>
08-07-23 JDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2024 4:19:18 PM
Creation date
2/2/2024 4:19:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the consultant’s proposal, Directs Collins and Perrault would like to further clarify the objectives <br />of a potential fall community event. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund requested the JDA provide staff with clear direction on how to create a <br />successful community event/town hall meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Reinhardt explained she would like to see hands on models or maps and data for <br />residents to review. She wanted information to be provided to residents and for residents to be <br />heard at the event. She stated she was excited about this event, because she hoped fears <br />would be lessened and ideas could be collected. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fabel stated he wanted the event to be meaningful. He believed there was a <br />need for a presentation as to the zoning or concepts that were in place and where there was <br />room for rezoning. He recommended a presentation be provided prior to the JDA taking <br />comments or recommendations on what should change. <br /> <br />Commissioner Frethem indicated she appreciated Councilmember Monson’s previous <br />statement that a cohesive vision be presented. She believed this would be really important, <br />along with identifying the goals for this project. She suggested the economics of the project be <br />clarified along with the project timeline. She recommended the concerns surrounding traffic be <br />addressed. She supported staff and outside experts presenting on topics at the community <br />event. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson recommended the event have a focused core message. She suggested <br />the core message be three or four scenarios, what this looks like and what the economics <br />would be. She anticipated all of the concerns could be addressed through the core message and <br />scenarios. She would love to have a presentation with one message delivered in a more formal <br />manner. She indicated she would be more than happy to make the presentation, or this could <br />be done by a staff member. After a presentation is made, she stated an open house could be <br />held for Q&A. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund suggested the event be held for 2½ hours with the first 30 minutes being <br />informal discussion. He recommended a formal presentation then be made by staff on the <br />topics that have been mentioned (remediation, housing density/TRC modeling, economics and <br />cost, traffic updates, energy, roadmap, updates/values for the project). He indicated the event <br />could then turn back into informal discussions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Reinhardt stated she liked the idea of a formal presentation and that all subjects <br />would be touched on. She recommended informational booths be created and staffed for each <br />of the topics in order to allow residents to direct their questions or comments after the formal <br />presentation. She did not want too much of the meeting to be a presentation. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund explained it would make sense for each of the seven or eight important topics <br />to have a booth where people could be directed to for more information.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.