09-27-23 JDA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

on the California piece was the orientation of the spine road. He explained the thumb piece has a broader depth which would assist in accommodating commercial industrial uses. He stated he believed the development would benefit by shrinking the amount of flex space. He commented the biggest change he was seeing in the commercial market over the past seven years was with the corporate campus market. Commissioner Monson requested comment on how adding density and traffic along the spine road would impact the project. Mr. Shaver anticipated the traffic patterns and number of trips would be downgraded by shifting to residential and away from commercial. Commissioner Fabel asked what the traffic implications were for adding another 500 units to the development. Mr. Lux did not believe there would be any traffic implications because traffic would be widely disbursed due to the diversity of housing on the site. Chair Wicklund requested the conversation now focus on affordability. Commissioner Frethem questioned if any of the planned apartments would be condos with opportunities for ownership. Mr. Lux stated a condo building was originally programmed for the Town Center, but explained condos were required to be built out of concrete, which was quite expensive. He noted a senior housing cooperative with 80 to 120 units was now being proposed in the Town Center and these units would be owner occupied. Commissioner Monson requested staff bring her information on the loss from ownership to rental given the density change. She asked that the developers consider how to address this loss. Mr. Lux commented on how there was a market for both owner occupied and for rent units at this time. Director Collins commented further on the affordability expectations for this development. She stated the County would like to see 10% of the ownership units are built to accommodate a downpayment assistance program and 20% of rental would be developed at 60% AMI or below. She reported the County would be a partner that would be investing in the affordability. Director Perrault asked if Alatus believed 20% of the rental units could be affordable. Mr. Lux stated this was part of his plan for the project going forward. Commissioner Monson inquired how Alatus would balance the type of units to ensure units were not sitting vacant. Mr. Lux explained the affordable units would be full. He anticipated the market rate units would also be full. He discussed how typical developments were assisted by TIF which allowed him to build with attractive amenities for five or eight years out. He stated this would be the challenge for this project, to build something that was forward thinking and not just for today. He indicated he was supportive of the affordability requirements, but wanted the numbers to work on the project to ensure it turns out really great.