CC 07-11-1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , . , .' Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, July 11, 1988. Page 3 CASE #88-21; MINOR SUBD., 4463 OLD HIGHWAY 10, BONA Council was referred to the Planner's report of 7-6-88 relative to the request for a lot split/minor subdivision at 4463 Old Highway 10, from Phyllis Bona. Bergly explained the two lots would meet or exceed zoning ordinance requirements for minimum lot area, width, depth and building setbacks as shown on the proposed lot split. He stated the proposed dividing line follows the general alignment of a natural drainage swale and advised the City Engineer had suggested the swale be regraded to follow the lot line and physically provide property definition. Bergly referred Council to the PInning Commission Minutes of 7-6-88 recommending approval fo the lot split subject to the applicant regrading the swale and moving the accessory buildings to the required 10-foot setback for accessory structures. Phyliss Bona, applicant, stated she would comply with the recommendation for regrading the swale and explained the two accessory buildings would be removed from the premises. Peck moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve Case No. 88-21, Minor Subdivision of Lot 11, Block 2, Lakeshore Homesites Addition, Phyllis Bona, subject to: 1. The applicant providing dividing Parcel "A" and distance on either side follow the lot line and Engineer. 2. The accessory structures that encroach on the newly created lot line be moved to meet the R-l setback requirement for accessory structures. a drainage and utility easement along the lot Parcel "B", that easement to extend an equal of the lot line, and the swale be regraded to define the property as approved by the City line Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) CASE #87-35; LAND STUDY, TASK FORCE REPORT, PART 2 Council was referred to the Planning Study for the N.E intersection fa Highway 1-694 and I-35W, Part 2, as prepared by the Planning Commission Task Force Committee. Dennis Probst, Chair of the Task Force Committee, was present to review the report and thanked the members of the committee and Planning Commission, and Planner John Bergly for their time and efforts. Probst stated the purpose of appearing before council this evening was to present the report and answer any questions. He advised the Commission concurred to submit the report to Council for their review and comments, and respectfully request that Council take action on the recommendations in the report at their next regular Council meeting held July 25. Probst reviewed the development options listed under Alternatives I, II and III, and outlined on page 25 of the report. He referred Council to the "Development Option Matrix" which evaluates each of the options as they relate to anticipated development and development timetable; market values; taxation; City portion of tax increment; major public improvements; Village involvement; issues and significant benefits. Probst explained the cost for improvement of the intersection at Highway 96 and 1-35W was not included in the major public improvements section; he advised the improvements would include a signal and bridge widening at the intersection and that the cost estimates were not available at this time. Also discussed was the possibility of a bridge across 1-35W to provide better access to the site; Probst explained the costs for the bridge could be shared jointly with the City of New Brighton. Probst also reviewed the Site Assets and Liabilities. Probst reviewed the recommendations outlined on pages 31 and 32 of the report and requested Council establish the Tax Increment District in 1988; he explained there is the possibility of legislation in 1989 which would further restrict tax increment regulations and it was his understanding cities with established tax increment districts may be "grandfathered" under the current regulations.