Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, April 27, 1987, 7:30 p.m. - Village Hall <br /> CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn <br /> called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were <br /> present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Nancy <br /> Hansen, Thomas Sather and Jeanne Winiecki. Councilmember Gary Peck arrived at <br /> 7:35 p.m, Also present were Attorney James Lynden, Planner Orlyn Miller, Barry <br /> Peters of Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, <br /> Clerk Administrator Patricia Morrison and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. <br /> APPROVE MINUTES Moved by Sather, seconded by Winiecki, that Council <br /> approve the Minutes of the April 13, 1987, Regular <br /> Council meeting as submitted, Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> BUSINESS FROM FLOOR None. <br /> CASE #87-09: TWO VAR. Council was referred to Planning Commission minutes <br /> FRONT/SIDE SETBACKS (4/1/87), recommending approval of the two variances <br /> 3290 SANDEEN ROAD as requested. Council also received an extract of the <br /> Board of Appeals minutes of 4/23/87, recommending <br /> approval of the 5 ft. Front Yard Setback Variance and denial of the 5 ft. Side <br /> Yard Setback Variance. <br />. Planner Miller reviewed the applicant's plans for removing the existing home <br /> and constructing a new home on the property. <br /> Candi McCloskey, applicant, explained that the architect had requested the 5 <br /> ft. side yard setback to increase the size of an interior room in the new home. <br /> She further advised that the property has a 10 ft. easement on the south side <br /> that she was not previously aware of. <br /> The Planner noted that the Planning Commission members were very impressed with <br /> the architectural design for the new home on this parcel. <br /> Council discussed the diagonal direction of the land as it extends back to the <br /> lake; it was determined that the side yard variance was not necessary. Council <br /> strongly encouraged the homeowner not to encroach any further, in either <br /> direction, on the side yards. <br /> Council commended the Board of Appeals for their analysis of the site. <br /> Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br /> the 5 ft. Front Yard Setback Variance, Case No. 87-09, 3290 Sandeen Road, based <br /> on a justifiable hardship of the slope of the land away from the street. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> CASE #87-04: Planner Miller briefly reviewed the rezoning request <br /> REZONING, HWY 96 and referred Council to the Planning Commission minutes <br />. AND RAMLINE AVE. of 3/4/87. He noted that the applicant's comprehensive <br /> plan statement should be expanded upon; also that the <br /> Planning Commission was favorably impressed with the architectural design of <br /> the proposal, however, they were concerned with the retail uses proposed as <br /> well as the blanket rezoning. <br /> James Stolpestad, co-owner of the property, distributed a letter dated 4/27/87 <br /> to the Councilmembers and a petition from residents supporting the proposed <br /> project. He stated that the owners of the property are proposing the "lessor of <br /> two eVils"; his opinion was that an office building would not be as attractive, <br /> could be a higher elevation. Stolpestad advised he recognizes the legitimate <br /> concerns of the neighbors and proposed to file a restrictive covenant against <br /> the land to limit the scope of the B-2 zoning classification. He requested that <br /> the City Attorney and Planner be authorized to work out such an agreement with <br /> the developer, <br />. Mike Scott, President of Jackson-Scott Associates, reviewed the site plan and <br /> building uses. <br /> Steve Hauge, President of Hauge and Company, reviewed the building design, <br /> building materials and landscape plan. He noted that the roof would be a <br /> "penthouse" design, enclosing the rooftop mechanical equipment. Hauge stated <br /> that they currently anticipate no neon signage and have tried to keep the <br /> buildings in pace with the residential surrounding area. <br /> i <br /> - <br />