Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ ' ~ <br />. <br /> Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting, April 23, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> CASE # 87-12 (Cont'd) The Board concensus in this case was that the slopes <br />. on the north and east sides of the lot did not justify <br /> a drainage hardship. <br /> Rather, it was noted that without a variance, the home would have little or no rear <br /> yard. On this basis, the variance was approved by a vote of 3-0 on Parcel A only. <br /> The Board determined that Parcel B should be able to meet City Zoning Ordinances, <br /> as it has a slope only on the rear of the property. <br /> The approval of the variance for Parcel A should be attached to the approval and <br /> conditions of the Minor Subdivision. <br /> Submitted by Barbara Piotrowski <br /> Chair <br />. <br />. <br />