Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CONCLUSIONS: <br />. L The requested setback variance is acceptable because: <br /> a. The subject lot is unique in that the front of the lot is not <br /> on a public street. <br /> b. No negative impact upon adjacent properties is evident. <br /> c. The steep slope at the north and east portions of the lot <br /> represent a hardship related to the land itself. <br /> 2. If the variance is granted, it should be conditioned upon satisfaction <br /> of all conditions attached to the approval of the minor subdivision. <br /> (Progress is being made, but not all items have been completed,) <br />. <br />. <br /> lIIb CASE #87-12 <br /> PAGE TWO , <br /> , <br />