Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ;L.; <br /> MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, July 27, 1987, 7:00 p.m. - Village Hall <br /> CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn <br /> . called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were <br /> present: Mayor Woodburn, Councilmembers Nancy Hansen <br /> and Gary Peck. Also present: Attorney James Lynden, Engineers Don <br /> - Christoffersen and Barry Peters, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk <br /> Administrator Patricia Morrison and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. <br /> CLOSED MEETING - Council discussed labor negotiations at a closed <br /> LABOR NEGOTIATIONS meeting between 7:00 and 7:30 p.m. <br /> APPROVE MINUTES Council discussed the motion for approval of the <br /> air-supported structure for the Arden Hills Club (page <br /> 4); expressed concerns relative to parking proximity to structure as outlined <br /> ,in the Uniform Fire Code. After discussion Council concurred that if a problem <br /> arises relative to the parking requirements pertaining to air-supported <br /> structures the matter should be returned to Council for consideration. <br /> Peck moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve <br /> the minutes qf the Regular Council meeting of July 13, 1987, as submitted. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) <br /> OTHER BUSINESS Chul Chung, owner of Charlie Chung's restaurant, <br /> REQ. LIQ. LIC. appeared before the Council to discuss his request <br /> for an On-Sale Liquor License; Council was referred to <br /> a letter from Mr. Chung dated July 18, 1987, stating his reasons for the <br /> . request. Chung stated he had discussed the matter with the Deputy Clerk and was <br /> told that there are no liquor licenses available. <br /> . Clerk Administrator Morrison explained that State Statutes allow 6 On-Sale <br /> Liquor Licenses to be issued by Statutory Cities with population between 5,000 <br /> and 10,OOO. <br /> There was discussion relative to the census figures, population projections and <br /> current population figure for Arden Hills. <br /> Chung stated that State Liquor Control advised cities could issue more <br /> licenses; also questioned if off-sale or club licenses,were available in Arden <br /> Hills. <br /> Morrison explained that the question of an,~dditional license would have to be <br /> placed on the ballot at an election; she noted that generally metropolitan area <br /> cities do not issue more licenses than the State allows. She further advised <br /> that she would research the off-sale and club license question and contact Mr. <br /> Chung. <br /> RES. 87-37; ASSMT. Council was referred to Resolution 87-37, re: Glenhill <br /> GLENHILL IMPRVMT. Avenue improvement assessments. <br /> Barry Peters, SEH, discussed the computations for the total cost of the <br /> improvement; he noted that this is a joint project with the City of Roseville <br /> . and that Arden Hills proportionate share of the total cost would be 46%. Peters <br /> asked for Council guidelines for amount 'to be assessed and method of assessing <br /> the benefitted property owners. <br /> . Council concurred that the amount to be assessed should remain at 50% as stated <br /> in the resolution; they noted that this percentage can be reduced but not <br /> exceeded. After discussion, Council concurred that the assessments should be <br /> on a per lot basis for the Glenhill Improvement. <br /> Council questioned the terminology in item #2' of the resolution: "..without <br /> regard to cash valuation,.."; Attorney Lynden stated this is a standard <br /> resolution and he would eval~te if the terminology should be stricken. <br /> . Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br /> Resolution No. 87-37, RESOLUTION RELATING TO IMPROVEMENT NO. P-ST-87-l GLENHILL <br /> DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT <br /> . ROLLS; furthermore, that Council determined up to 50% of the costs may be <br /> assessed to affected proper~y owners, calculated on a per lot basis. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. (3-0) <br />