Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, June 29, 1987 <br />. Page 5 <br />. WATER METER (Cont' d) Hansen reported that the PS/W Committee had suggested <br /> the following wording: "If the card is not returned <br /> within (a certain time period) we will contact you and arrange for a date to <br /> gain access to read the meter." ; it was her opinion that most residents would <br /> cooperate because eventually the discrepancy would be found and the cost would <br /> increase. <br /> After discussion, Council concurred to instruct appropriate staff to draft a <br /> "mock-up" water meter reading card and return the sample to Council for their <br /> review. <br /> REQUEST NO PKING. Council was referred to the Public Safety/Works <br /> SIGNS: ROYAL LANE Committee minutes of June 18th; relative to parking <br /> problem in the vicinity of Floral Park. <br /> Raddatz advised a request had been received for "No Parking" signs to be placed <br /> on one side of Royal Lane during the Little League games at Floral Park; poor <br /> visibility and safety of children were reasons cited. <br /> Council reviewed the parking ordinance, which prohibits parking within 20 ft. <br /> of any intersection without a crosswalk; questioned if enforcement would help <br /> alleviate the problem. <br /> Paul Malone', PS/W Committee member, stated the street curves and with vehicles <br /> parked on both sides visibility is extremely limited. He questioned if the no <br />. parking area would be easily identifiable if signs were not posted. <br /> Hansen asked the Parks Director if it would be feasible to use a cardboard sign <br /> and have the team coaches carry them with the ball equipment and post prior to <br /> each game. <br /> Buckley stated, in his opinion, the cardboard signs would deteriorate quickly; <br /> he favored a more permanent material. <br /> Moved by Sather, seconded by Winiecki, that Council <br /> approve posting Royal Lane, at the intersection in question, with "No Parking <br /> Here to Corner" signs or directional arrows, whichever best identify the area <br /> as a no parking zone. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> PURCH. WOOD CHIPPER Council was referred to Raddatz's memorandum of 6-25-87 <br /> recommending the purchase of a used wood chipper. <br /> Raddatz advised that the chipper was to be purchased new in 1988, jointly with <br /> the Parks Department, at a total estimated cost of $12,000.00. He and Buckley <br /> had received notice of the sale of a used chipper; after vieWing and operating <br /> the machine they found it to be in excellent condition. The owner quoted a <br /> price of $4,600 for the chipper; Raddatz stated he and Buckley recommend <br /> purchase of the machine and suggested an initial offer of $4,200.00. He noted <br /> that no summer personnel was hired for Public Works this year (due to past <br /> problems with employees and a change in the school work program), therefore, he <br />. recommended purchase of the chipper from the funds not expended for hiring <br /> summer personnel. <br /> Council questioned the estimated life span of this type of machinery. <br /> Raddatz advised that a chipper usually has a life span of apprOXimately 20 <br /> years; the motor on the machine for sale has 358 hours of operation and <br /> reportedly does not use any oil. <br /> ~ Moved by Hansen, seconded by Winiecki, that Council <br /> approv the purchase of a wood chipper, at a cost not to exceed $4,600.00, and <br /> that the funds budgeted for 1987 Public Works Summer Personnel be transferred <br /> to accomplish the purchase. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> SPRINKLING BAN The Public Works Supervisor reported that the <br /> sprinkling ban has been successful; he noted the pumps <br />. have stopped running on a continual basis <br /> LAKE JOHANNA DAM Council was advised by Raddatz that the structure which <br /> exists as a dam between Lake Johanna and Little Lake <br /> Johanna has some deterioration; it was Raddatz's opinion that the extent of <br /> deterioration does not warrant replacement at this time. <br /> Council discussed if this was the Village's responsibility or Rice Creek <br /> Watershed. <br />