My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-28-1987
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
CCP 09-28-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:04 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:42:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, September 14, 1987 <br /> Page 3 <br /> .. <br /> RES. #87-59; ASSMT Mayor Woodburn opened the Public Hearing at 8:18 p.m. <br /> DIS. TREE REMOVAL and asked the Clerk Administrator to verify the <br /> publication and mailing of the Notice of Hearing on the <br /> . special assessments for diseased tree removal. <br /> Morrison advised that due notice was published in the New BriRhton Bulletin on <br /> August 26th and mailed on August 28, 1987. <br /> Mayor Woodburn asked if there were any comments from the floor. <br /> After determining there were no comments from the floor, Mayor Woodburn closed <br /> the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. <br /> Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br /> Resolution No. 87-59, ADOPTING AND CONFJRHING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED <br /> TREE REMOVAL. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> RES. #87-60; ASSMT Mayor Woodburn opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m. <br /> ROSEVILLE WATER and asked the Clerk Administrator to verify the <br /> publication and mailing of the Notice of Hearing on the <br /> special assessment for the Roseville Water Connection. <br /> Morrison advised that due notice was published in the New BriRhton Bulletin on <br /> August 26th, and mailed on August 28, 1987. <br /> Mayor Woodburn asked if there were any comments from the floor. <br /> After determining there were no comments from the floor, Mayor Woodburn closed <br /> the public hearing at 8:21 p.m. <br /> . Peck moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve <br /> Resolution No. 87-60, ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ROSEVILLE <br /> WATER CONNECTION. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> CASE #87-28; SUP Council was referred to Planner's report, 8-26-87, and <br /> ANTENNA, 1541 Planning Commission Minutes, 9-2-87, relative to the <br /> EDGEWATER, KAHNKE Special Use Permit application for a Radio Antenna at <br /> 1541 Edgewater Avenue, Joseph Kahnke. <br /> Planner Miller explained the applicant is proposing to install an amateur radio <br /> antenna in the rear yard of his home; 35 ft. in height, 2 inches in diameter, <br /> does not require guy wires, and will be located approximately 35 ft. from his <br /> home and from each side lot line. The tower will be approximately 60 ft. from <br /> the rear lot line and, in case of windfall, it would clear the house and <br /> adjacent properties. Miller discussed the aesthetics of the tower and noted <br /> that the tower will be visible from adjacent properties and residents across <br /> the street, however, because of the scale of this antenna, it would have no <br /> greater impact than a regular TV antenna or a flagpole. <br /> Miller advised that the Planning Commission had recommended approval and <br /> reviewed the conditions stipulated. <br /> Joseph Kahnke, 1541 Edgewater, was present to answer any questions. <br /> Council questioned if there would be additional apparatus on the antenna. <br /> . Kahnke explained that he was not certain at this time; it would depend on <br /> reception. He commented that if extensions were to be added at a later date, <br /> they would be approximately 14 feet vertically, with rods measuring 1 inch in <br /> diameter. <br /> Winiecki asked if a 14 ft. span would be the largest the antenna would support. <br /> Kahnke stated that was correct. <br /> Council discussed whether or not the antenna would interfere with radio or <br /> television reception in the area. <br /> Winiecki commented it was clearly pointed out at the Planning Commission <br /> meeting that the low level transmission does not interfere with either radio <br /> . or television reception. Planner Miller advised he has had discussions with <br /> experts who stated if appropriate equipment is used that should not be a <br /> problem; he is not aware of any complaints given those currently operating in <br /> the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.