My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-28-1987
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
CCP 09-28-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:04 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:42:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> , <br /> FUDALI. KEEFER & ANDERSON <br /> . EDWARD S. CROZIER <br /> ROSS D. GRIMWOOD <br /> ORL YN W. MILLER <br /> September 10, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The location of access road shows the physical location of the access road <br /> used to service the small dam on the westerly portion of the easement. <br /> For purposes of computing open space, what is proposed to be Lot 23 has been <br /> used in the computation~ <br /> Orlyn indicates in his correspondence dated March 3, 1987, that the interest <br /> of the City would be served if a conveyance of Lot 23 were made to the Depart- <br /> ment of the Interior with the restrictions indicated in his March correspondence. <br /> My purpose in writing is to bring each of you up to date as to the progress <br /> that has been made with respect to the development of Block I and 2 and to <br /> request your thoughts as to a conveyance of Lot 23 to secure a release of <br /> the easement that effects Lots 1 to 8 in Block 1 of the ,original Edgewater <br /> Estates plat. <br /> I hope the information that I am enclosing is helpful to you and would appreciate <br /> your comments and suggestions. <br /> . I am available on short notice to meet with you to discuss your comments and <br /> hope that we can bring our request for an easement release to an early con- <br /> clusion4 <br /> Of course, we understand that the right to overflow to a certain elevation will <br /> ,be retained by the Department of the Interior. Should it be felt by the Depart- <br /> ment of the Interior that that requirement not be necessary, we would also appre- <br /> ciate your comments on that so we may address it separately. <br /> As an aside, I might comment that the preliminary plat recites as a name <br /> "Edgewater Estates". I am assuming it will be called Edgewater Estates II <br /> or something like that so as to not be confused with the existing Edgewater <br /> Estates. <br /> M;'~ <br /> ""'.m ,~..,.. <br /> WJK:llk <br /> Enclosures <br /> . <br /> - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.