Laserfiche WebLink
a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner <br />not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. <br />According to the Applicant, a covered front porch addition for a single-family home is a <br />reasonable use of the Subject Property in the R-1 Zoning District because the design of the <br />existing principal structure front entry does not mitigate the safety risks posed to <br />inhabitants and visitors of the residence by ice accumulation. <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to <br />the property not created by the landowner. <br />According to the Applicant, the Subject Property's dwelling unit was constructed in 1965. <br />The current property owners purchased the property in 2018 so they did not create the <br />circumstances of the Subject Property's nonconforming front yard setback. <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character <br />of the neighborhood. <br />According to the Applicant, the variance for the covered front porch would not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood. The Applicant states that the porch would bring <br />nostalgia, charm, and a theme of relaxation to the neighborhood. It will also have the <br />useful function of providing shelter to the main entry. The property owners state that the <br />front porch would help foster neighborhood connections and enhance the home's aesthetic <br />as the design will integrate into the existing front fagade. <br />3. Economic Consideration. Economic consideration alone does not constitute a practical <br />difficulty. <br />The Applicant states that the proposed variance is not requested for economic reasons alone. <br />4. Access to Sunlight. Inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems shall be <br />considered a practical difficulty. <br />A solar energy system is not proposed. <br />Findings of Fact <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their January 3, 2024 meeting and have <br />offered the following findings for consideration: <br />General Findings: <br />1. The City received a land use application for a variance request to the required R-1 Zoning <br />District front yard setback at the Subject Property 1666 Oak Avenue. <br />2. A single-family dwelling is a permitted use within the R-1 Zoning District. <br />3. Section 1320.06 of the Arden Hills City Code requires a front yard setback of 40 feet within <br />the R-1 Zoning District. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting for February 12 2024 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2023\PC 23-023, 1666 Oak Avenue — VAR <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />