My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
02-12-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2024 4:25:01 PM
Creation date
2/8/2024 4:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
463
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION — JANUARY 8, 2024 10 <br />Mayor Grant asked if they choose the option for some screening, could they waive the screening. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe said yes, if the applicant can show that the screening <br />reduced the efficiency of the system or the cost of the system was increased as a result, they could <br />say it wouldn't be required; the language in Draft Ordinance #2 would allow that review. <br />Mayor Grant said due to the many different kinds of lots in Arden Hills, he would rather have <br />the screening and waive it than not have the screening and someone proposes something they felt <br />required screening. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if there was a number of units allowed. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe said this would be considered a detached accessory <br />structure so two would be the maximum. They would be limited to the lot coverage requirements <br />just like any other accessory structure. They would evaluate it with whatever the zoning district <br />requirements are to make sure they don't exceed the coverage requirements. <br />Mayor Grant could go either way. As a practical matter they're mounted so high they are <br />difficult to screen. He directed staff to move forward with one option and if they find the need to <br />change it they can change it later. <br />F. Work Session Priorities <br />Mayor Grant asked for comments. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said she was hoping to have the PTRC items on the February or <br />March work session. She was also wondering about the accessory dwelling unit discussion. <br />City Administrator Perrault said an application had come in so they have to discuss it. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe added a resident had submitted a land use application <br />so they are working with her. The language would be for the concept review to see if there was a <br />willingness to allow for accessory dwelling units. <br />Councilmember Holden asked to add infill, and discussion of a single person issue such as one <br />person asking for ducks and it gets on the list. She would also like a building materials update. <br />She also asked to have the list arranged in groups like committee things, management etc. <br />Mayor Grant asked if they really need to talk about the Coon Rapids JPA. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said they normally do this time of year, but <br />if Council was trusting of staff to handle the process he was OK dismissing the item. He did want <br />to have discussion regarding Red Fox and Gray Fox, he would write a memo and if Council <br />wanted to discuss they could bring it back. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would like to talk about doing a community survey as well as the <br />economic development vision for the City outside of Rice Creek Commons. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.