My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
02-12-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2024 4:25:01 PM
Creation date
2/8/2024 4:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
463
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — JANUARY 8, 2024 16 <br />has to be redone on the wells and none of this information was available at this time. He wished <br />that the entire Council could be included in the planning process for this project. <br />Councilmember Monson explained a lot of the comments that have been made would be <br />addressed in the development agreement and were not part of the zoning code. She reported she <br />would never put the City in financial harm for a development. She indicated she would make sure <br />the financial statements were sound. She encouraged the residents to watch and listen to the JDA <br />meetings, along with the worksession meeting where the economics of this project were <br />discussed. She reported there was opportunity for residents to comment on TCAAP at all City <br />Council and worksession meetings. In addition, she encouraged residents to contact her if there <br />was any information they would like to know about the TCAAP project. <br />Councilmember Monson called the question. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Fabel seconded a <br />motion to call the question. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden <br />and Mayor Grant opposed). <br />The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant opposed). <br />MOTION: Councilmember Fabel moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution 2024-006 for Planning Case 23-021 for <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendments to Chapter 6 and Appendix G to allow for <br />an increase in residential density up to 1,960 units within the regulating plan <br />for TCAAP based on the Findings of Fact and as presented in the January 8, <br />2024 report to the City Council. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe asked if the Council's motion included the amended <br />language for the 60% AMI language. <br />Mayor Grant reported the question has been called and the language could no longer be <br />amended. <br />Councilmember Monson requested clarification from the City Attorney on this matter. <br />City Attorney Schmidt stated it was her understanding that when Councilmember Fabel made <br />the motion he included it at that point, but when he reread the motion, it was not. <br />Councilmember Fabel explained he read the motion straight from Community Development <br />Director Jagoe's recommendation within the staff report. <br />Mayor Grant asked if staff could clarify what the motion was. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe reported the recommended motion from staff <br />includes reference to the adoption of a Resolution, which is the Comprehensive Plan language. <br />She stated she was confirming if the Council was approving the language as presented, or as <br />amended, noting suggested language that 20% of the units would be at 60% AMI or less. <br />City Administrator Perrault explained the motion could be withdrawn and restated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.