CCP 11-09-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3, Because the principal structure is set back deep on the lot, it is difficult to find a site for an ATM which would not be in the front yard, except its present location in the drive-through area, I . therefore recommended that the applicant at least attempt to , position the ATM in a location that would meet the required front setback (55') to minimize the variances required, An alternative location which would satisfy setback requirements was evaluated by the applicant (see attached alternative sketch), but the bank prefers the proposed location for reasons of visibility, ease of turning movements, and stacking space. The alternate location would require only a variance from the provision that an accessory structure shall not be in the front yard area. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The alternate location for the ATM is preferred because it meets minimum front setback requirements and will be less conspicuous, However, the small scale of the accessory structure will not substantially alter the appearance of the site even if it is located as proposed, 2, If the Planning Commission finds the proposed ATM location acceptable, the justification for the variances would have to be based on the following reasons: a. The setback of the principal structure and the established vehicular circulation makes it impossible to place the ATM in a location visible from both streets without placing it in the front yard area. . b, The proposed location for the ATM is necessary to provide adequate visibility, safety and vehicular circulation. c, The proposed placement of the ATM does not negatively impact adjacent properties. . nnrO CASE #87-31 PAGE 2