Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, October 12, 1987 <br /> Page 5 <br /> VET HOSP (Cont'd) Lynden further advised that if the City has a specific <br /> contractual arrangement with Brighton Veterinary <br /> hospital, which does not leave it much descretion in how it operates, the City <br /> can delegate the power to collect fees and to issue licenses to the Hospital. <br /> He suggested that such an arrangement should include indemnity and insurance <br /> . provisions, which include contractual liability, as outlined in his letter of <br /> 10-8-87. <br /> Council requested that Village staff research the current contractual <br /> arrangement and review insurance with Mr. Hite, the Village insurance <br /> representative and the Veterinary Hospital personnel. <br /> . <br /> Councilmember Hansen commented that it was her opinion that the fees should be <br /> increased to reflect current costs and she would prefer to have Section 5-61 <br /> amended to include provision for cats. <br /> Council concurred to request the Clerk Administrator research the contractual <br /> agreement with the Brighton Veterinay Hospital, to leave Section 5-61 as is, <br /> and contact Mr. Hite regarding insurance requirements. <br /> CHAR. GAMBL ORD. Mayor Woodburn advised that he had requested the <br /> matter of the proposed Charitable Gambling Ordinance <br /> be placed on the agenda for Council discussion; intent was to determine if <br /> Council was inclined to proceed with passage of the Ordinancs" pertaining to <br /> Charitable Gambling in the City. <br /> . Peck advised he would prefer to pursue a Charitable Gambling Ordinance and he <br /> questioned how the Ordinance would affect the gambling licenses currently <br /> issued relative to "phase out". <br /> Lynden advised that there are provisions in the State Statutes for Gambling <br /> Board to notify communities of license applications and for the communities to <br /> reject the applications. He advised that in Arden Hills there is a business <br /> location f,om which gambling organizations operate and that is what prompted <br /> the ordinance provision discussions for phase out of gambling within a <br /> reasonable period of time; the amortization period must be reasonable for <br /> decision to be upheld in a court of law. He also stated the decision is based <br /> on what sort of financial investment is involved and how tenable is the <br /> business; the licenses at the location may not be approved the next year. <br /> Councilmember Winiecki suggested Council place a moritoriam on Charitable <br /> Gambling Licenses in the City of Arden Hills, not issuing additional licenses <br /> than those currently in effect, until such time as the Ordinance has been <br /> drafted. <br /> Morrison advised that the Council has the option to limit the number of <br /> licenses each year, unless the Council would be more comfortably with a formal <br /> moritoriam. <br /> . Lynden suggested that he and the Clerk A~inistrator could draft a Resolution, <br /> prior to the next regular Council meeting of October 26th. <br /> Moved by Winiecki, seconded by Peck, that Council <br /> request the City Attorney to draft a Resolution which states that Council <br /> hereby authorizes the Clerk Administrator to disapprove any additional license <br /> applications for Charitable Gambling in the City of Arden Hills, as the <br /> Attorney is currently drafting a Charitable Gambling Ordinance, and to notify <br /> the Charitable Gambling Board by forwarding them a copy of said Resolution. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> CABLE COMM. REPORT Council was referred to Cable Committee minutes of <br /> PUB. ACCESS/BUDGET 10-8-87, relative .to the Status of the proposed <br /> reorganization of Public Access and the 1988 Budget. <br /> Bill Bauer, Cable Committee ~epresentative, was present to discuss the budget <br /> increases and explain they are primarily due to a larger portion of the <br /> administrative and secretarial salary expense being charged to this budget and <br /> less to the Access Corporation. He noted the Commisison anticipates increased <br /> time on NSCC matters in public access negotiations with Hauser. Bauer advised <br /> . that Cities have until October 15th to comment on the proposed budget; he <br /> stated that the Commission expressed no problems with the proposed budget. <br /> Bauer discussed the proposed reorganization of Public Access and noted that it <br /> seems evident Hauser would like to discontinue providing services for public <br /> access. He advised that opinions differ on what should be provided, what is <br /> criteria for measuring its success and what are the benefits. <br />