CC 09-28-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, September 28, 1987 " , ~ Page 2 BRIGHTON VET. HOSP. Council was referred to a Jetter from Dr. Hedges dated 9/21/87, relative to collection of fees, licensing at the hospital, increasing boarding fees for animals and requesting advertisement of the adoption service available at the veterinary hospital in the Arden Hills Town Crier. After discussion of these items, Council concurred that the Attorney should . review the matter of licensing at the Brighton Veterinary Hospital and report to Council at the next regular meeting; suggested the Clerk Administrator review the Arden Hills Code to determine if disposal of animals is addressed. Moved by Sather, seconded by Winiecki, that the letter from the Brighton Veterinary Hospital, relative to licensing at the hospital and increasing fees, be continued to the Regular Council meeting of October 12, 1987. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) ORD. 11250, AMENDING Council was referred to the proposed Ordinance LIC'S. AND PERMITS amending Section 13-24 and 13-26, pertaining to licenses and permits, and Sections 6-62 and 6-147, pertaining to increasing insurance requirements. Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council Introduce by Title Ordinance No. 250, AMENDING SECTION 13-24 AND 13-26 OF ARDEN HILLS CODE BY DELETING THEREFROM AND ADDING THERETO CERTAIN LICENSES AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE FEES BY RESOLUTION AND SECTION 13-26 BY DELETINb PRORATING OF CONTRACTORS LICENSE FEES AND SECTION 6-62 AND SECTION 6-147, BY INCREASING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) . RES. #87-63; LIC'S. Council was referred to the proposed resolution, which PERMIT FEES & INS. incorporates investigative fees and liability insurance requirements. Councilmember Winiecki suggested clarifying the fee amounts indicated in the resolution by placing the appropriate amounts and per item such as signs, amusements devices, etc., beside the title of the license or permit listed. Attorney Lynden advised Council that this proposed resolution should not be passed prior to the Ordinance No. 250, which amends the license and permit fees and increases the insurance requirements; suggested tbis matter held until the Ordinance amendment was formally passed by final reading. Council concurred to continue this matter until the Regular Council meeting to be held October 12, 1987. ORD. #251; COMPL. Council was referred to the proposed Ordinance No. 251, OF CONSTRUCTION amending Sections 6-75 and 6-128 of the Arden Hills Code, relative to establishing time limits for completion of new construction and additions, alterations or improvements to . one- Or two-family dwellings. Attorney Lynden reviewed Section 6-75 (c), which had been taken from the existing provision and is probably not apropos with the changes in subsections (a) and (b); suggested Council may want to delete subsection (c) and retaining subsection (d), He also noted in Section 6-128, the first sentence is taken verbatim from the Code; Lynden was informed that the Building Inspector questioned the sentence, and noted that the sentence has been in the Code for the last 12 years. Morrison advised that the Building Inspector preferred the deletion of the terminology "Division 1" in the first sentence of Section 6-128; his concern related to the possibility of deleting single family and two family homes from the provisions contained in this ordinance by 'leaving the language in. She noted that in discussion with the Attorney, he advised it would be a matter of interpretation; Morrison suggested the Attorney and Building Inspector discuss the matter and reach a workable solution. Another concern mentioned by the Building Inspector related to Section 6-75 (b) (3); paving of driveways; he advised that we currently do not require that. Mayor Woodburn expressed concern that the title is not self-explanatory; he . suggested the Ordinance be explained more fully for residents.