Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />of the Regular4ltuncil Meeting, September 14, l~ <br /> <br />EDGEWATER (Cont'd) Council expressed concerns relative to public access in <br />this area, if the area could become a park, if the <br />residents of the townhouse development would be restricted from use of the land <br />and if the land transfer would affect the assessments on the property. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Miller advised that all assessments were charged to the developer and this <br />transfer of land should not effect those assessments; the transfer would create <br />8 buildable lots in the single family portion of the Edgewater development. <br /> <br />Miller noted that if the City cannot legally enforce such restrictions and was <br />not comfortable with the land conveyance, it would revert back to the current <br />situation on the single family lots, with one Or two unbuildable lots. <br /> <br />Council discussed the density calculations for the parcel which included the <br />open space as an amenity: also discussed if a precedent would be set for other <br />developable land in the City. <br /> <br />Miller advised that in terms of density, if property were stipulated to remain <br />as permanent open space, the density remains the same regardless of ownership. <br />In terms of use or maintenance of the land, that could change and public access <br />may be a concern. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council concurred that they would prefer more time to review <br />this matter and instructed the Planner to convey their initial concerns to the <br />owner's attorney. Furthermore, they instructed staff to contact the attorney <br />for his opinion regarding the placement of restrictions on the property if <br />. conveyed to a Federal agency. <br /> <br />OWNERSHIP OF CAP. <br />EQUIP.: FIRE DEPT <br /> <br />Council was referred to a letter from the City of <br />Shoreview , 9/1/87, requesting information relative to <br />Arden Hills position on the ownership of future fire <br />equipment in the City. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council concurred that the Clerk Administrator be directed to <br />respond to the City of Shor.view that Arden Hills position is to own future <br />capital equipment if purchased by the City; this matter will be discussed in <br />conjunction with the Arden Hills contract with the LJVFD. <br /> <br />RECYCLING; COMM. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Council was referred to the minutes of the Solid Waste <br />Management Sub-Committee meeting, 8/17/87; recoDDllending <br />proposed implementation of a recycling program. <br /> <br />Paul Malone, Sub-Committee member, was present and outlined the cODDllittee <br />objectives: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- Institute a curbside pickup program for recyclables. <br />- Fund curbside pickup via a surcharge on the haulers' billings. <br />- Establish volume-based refuse collection fees. <br />- Maintain an open hauling systems. <br /> <br />Malone advised that the eight licensed haulers in the City were invited to <br />attend; three of the eight were present. He stated that the haulers were not in <br />favor of the City adopting an organized hauling system and did not appear to be <br />interested in establishing and enforcing a volume-based rate plan. The haulers <br />discussed separate pickup of lawn and garden refuse, however, there is no <br />adequate dumping site available, at present, large enough to accommodate <br />significant amounts of material. <br /> <br />Malone advised that after cODDllittee discussion, the following recommendations <br />for Council consideration were made: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. Arden Hills should maintain an open hauling system. <br />2. A bi-weekly curbside pickup program for recyclables should be <br />implemented. <br />3. Funding of the curbside pickup could be accomplished through a flat <br />surcharge on the City's utility bills. (Bi-weekly pickup is estimated to <br />cost $26,000 per year, $9.00 per household. A $1.00 per-month charge <br />was recoDDllended) <br />4. Encourage haulers to offer volume-based pricing (approximately 15% <br />below current rates). <br />5. Further consider separate pickup of yard waste; explore possible <br />sites that would be adequate to handle the garden refuse. <br />