Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Regular Lcu Meeting, September 14, 1. <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />SCREENING MECH. <br />EQUIP. POT 0' GOLD <br /> <br />Councilmember Hansen questioned the status of screening <br />the mechanical equipment at the Pot O'Gold Bingo Parlor. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator advised that she and the Zoning Administrator had discussed <br />this matter with Jim Adams and explained that the current plantings were not <br />sufficient to accomplish the screening of the mechanical units at the Bingo <br />Parlor. Morrison stated that Adams explained he would contact the landscape <br />company and report back to City staff. Iagoexplained that she had tried to <br />contact Adams this date; she did not receive a return call. <br /> <br />Hansen suggested the owner be advised to accomplish the screening and be given <br />a specific deadline. <br /> <br />SPEC. EVENT <br />SIGN; AMOCO <br /> <br />Councilmember Hansen questioned if the Amoco Station, <br />County Road E, had exceeded the 10 day period for their <br />Special Even Sign permit. <br /> <br />Morrison advised she would review the permit and contact Amoco if they had <br />exceeded the expiration date. <br /> <br />DELIQ. UTILITY <br />ACCT; CEPECK <br /> <br />Councilmember Hansen questioned if the delinquent <br />utility account for Mr. Cepeck, 1175 Amble Drive, would <br />be considered for amnesty since Erickson's account was <br />given such consideration and removed from the assessment roll. <br /> <br />Public Works Supervisor explained that the Cepeck situation was different; <br />Cepeck has received credit for a portion of water consumption, due to the fact <br />. that the defective meter was returned to the company and the discrepancy could <br />not be proven. <br /> <br />ABSENT: PS/W MTG. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hansen reported that she would be absent <br />from the Public Safety/Works Committee meeting of 9/24; <br />she would be attending a Fire Pension meeting. <br /> <br />WATER SHUT-OFF; <br />DELIQ. UTILITIES <br /> <br />Counci1member Peck suggested Council discuss the <br />establishment of a policy for shutting off water to <br />residents/businesses that have delinquent utility <br />accounts. He questioned if Council would have the authority to reject <br />applications from contractors and other residents in the Village if their <br />utility accounts are delinquent. <br /> <br />Council discussed an appropriate time-frame for notification of water shut off, <br />penalties that could be imposed and how to deal with hardship cases. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council concurred that it would be appropriate to notify <br />residents/businesses of water shut off if the account is delinquent for two <br />quarters and payment arrangements have not been made with the City within 10 <br />working days. Council directed the Clerk Administrator to conduct a survey of <br />surrounding communities regarding their time-frame for water shut off, any <br />... problems relating to water shut-off for residences, and amounts of penalties <br />imposed on delinquent accounts. <br /> <br />There was discussion regarding increasing the current amount of penalty imposed: <br />8 percent is initially charged or adding an additional 8 percent penalty at <br />the end of the quarter. <br /> <br />Council discussed establishing guidelines for hardship cases; concurred that <br />the standards for hardship cases could be set after reviewing the survey <br />information. <br /> <br />REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR <br /> <br />SPEC. EVENT SIGN; <br />KEITHSON ADDITION <br /> <br />Council was referred to an informational letter from <br />the Clerk Administrator; regarding an aerial special <br />event sign at the Keithson Addition, that is being <br />displayed in conjunction with the Parade of Homes. <br /> <br />Morrison stated that Council approval is not required for special event signs <br />in a residential districts; however, the sign exceeds the 35 ft. height <br />requirements. She questioned if Council favored allowing the height variation. <br /> <br />"'After discussion, Council concurred that the aerial sign should be brought into <br />conformance with the 35 ft. height requirement. <br />