My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-18-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
12-18-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 11:15:41 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 11:15:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - DECEMBER 18, 2023 15 <br />Mayor Grant said they did, and the other developers were happy to come in. <br />Councilmember Holden added that they needed more than one person with a vision because <br />everyone sees the future differently. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would be interested in that, but she would like to understand what <br />was happening with Outlot A before they have that meeting. She also wondered if there was a <br />County Director of Economic Development that could provide input. <br />Mayor Grant stated that he didn't know if Staff had good direction or not. <br />City Administrator Perrault thought the conversation coalesced around having Mr. Lux and/or <br />his commercial representatives invited to a meeting after the JDA work session and invite <br />additional developers including the Outlot A development person to discuss commercial <br />marketing conditions, zoning conditions that might be averse to attracting development, along <br />with warehousing/commercial/manufacturing options that we allow or don't allow. <br />Councilmember Holden didn't want the developer of Outlot A there because they may already <br />have bias on what they're creating and may want to offset it so they can fill their commercial area <br />first. She also didn't think a County representative should be there because they are biased and <br />may want things in Arden Hills that may not be the best for Arden Hills. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would still be interested in having the County understanding that <br />there may be biases. <br />City Administrator Perrault said he would start working on it and give the Council an update. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the timing of the County approving Outlot A. <br />E. Arden Manor Hardcourt — CDBG Discussion <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller stated there was a change order approved in July to <br />remove the hard court from the Arden Manor Park improvements this past summer with the idea <br />of pursuing future Community Development Block Grant funding. Staff recommends the first <br />step be to hire a consultant to begin the CDBG process. Cost is anticipated to be about $5,000. <br />There are two options the Council should consider with the CDBG program: the first is applying <br />for CDBG to cover all engineering and construction costs resulting in a 2025 construction <br />timeline, or the City paying for the design engineering cost and applying for construction cost and <br />construction admin cost resulting in a 2024 construction timeline. Staff would like direction on <br />whether to pursue the grant and to consider direct selecting a consultant for professional services <br />to administer and deliver the proposed project. <br />Councilmember Holden thought they should do it. <br />Councilmember Monson would support getting it shovel ready for construction in 2024 and was <br />OK with direct selecting. <br />Mayor Grant agreed, and said to go after the grant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.