Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Minutes of the RegUlilll~ounCil Meeting, July 27, 1987 . <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />SPEED LIMIT (Cont'd) Nelson outlined the process for DNR approval: <br />Council should submit a copy of the ordinance amendment <br />to DNR for approval within 120 days; DNR submits amendment to Ramsey County for <br />their approval; County returns to DNR and DNR returns to Arden Hills. <br />Publication of the amendment is required after all approvals are received. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Nelson commented that he had polled the neighbors and received favorable <br />support; Hansen agreed that most residents in the area would favor the speed <br />restriction. <br /> <br />Nelson thanked Hayor Woodburn for his time and concern when he stopped to view <br />the lake level this week. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council direct the <br />Village Attorney to prepare an ordinance amendment which limits the speed of <br />boats on Lake Johanna to 40 mph at those times of the day when the 5 mph speed <br />'limit restriction is not imposed; furthermore, that staff submit the necessary <br />forms to the State Department of Natural Resources for approval and publish <br />ordinance amendment as necessary. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) <br /> <br />Council suggested that the proposed ordinance be published in the Town Crier; <br />also that Jim Tolaas of Ramsey County be notified to correct signage at the <br />lake. <br /> <br />REG. BOAT TRAFFIC <br />ON LAKE JOSEPHINE <br /> <br />Council was referred to s letter from James Potocnik, <br />7/16/87, requesting that Arden Hills regulate boating <br />traffic in a counterclockwise manner on Lake Josephine <br />and to post a ItNO SWIHHING IN BOAT LAUNCH AREA" sign. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council concurred that regulating the boating traffic in a counterclockwise <br />manner has worked well on Lake Johanna and would enhance'water safety on Lake <br />Josephine; agreed that the no swimming sign should also be posted. <br /> <br />Council directed the Clerk Administrator to contact the City of Roseville <br />regarding this matter; also to contact Ramsey County and forward by letter <br />Council concurrence with the requests. <br /> <br />DAYBRIDGE LEARNING <br />CENTER; SITE REV. <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's memorandum of <br />7/23/87, regarding applicant's request to move the <br />daycare center site to the corner of Highway 96 and <br />Hamline Avenue. <br /> <br />Randy Peterson, Rand-Maur construction, appeared before the Council and <br />requested that approval for relocation of the site to the corner location be <br />obtained administratively, rather than returning to Planning Commission and <br />Council for their review at formal meetings. He stated they would work closely <br />with City staff. <br /> <br />... Council asked if the Attorney or Clerk Administrator had any comments. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn stated that it was his opinion the site was never formally <br />platted into parcels. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peck saw no problem with relying on stsff for approval; expressed <br />concern relative to the roadway easement. <br /> <br />After discussion, the Rand-Haur representatives stated they were willing to <br />grant a roadway easement of a minimum of 35 ft. to the City and they would <br />agree to improvement of the driveway approach and roadway necessary to enter <br />the daycare site. <br /> <br />Randy Peterson stated that the conditions originally approved have not been <br />altered concerning the easement; he stated that they would work with the <br />Planner and other staff members to assure that intent of the original approval <br />is carried out. ' <br /> <br />There was no further discussion. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />STATUS REPORT; <br />HWY96/HAMLINE <br /> <br />Council was referred to the proposed purchase agreement <br />for the land adjacent to the Village Hall on Highway 96 <br />and 'Hamline Avenue. <br />