My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
01-08-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 2:59:10 PM
Creation date
2/13/2024 2:58:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JANUARY 8, 2024 2 <br /> Councilmember Monson indicated she did not object to pulling these items from the Consent <br /> Calendar but given the items that are pulled and what she anticipated the conversation was going <br /> to be, she supported moving Item 9 to just before Unfinished Business in order to have that <br /> conversation after TCAAP. However, she did support the pulled items being discussed after <br /> Items 11 A and 11 B. <br /> Councilmember Holden explained she disagreed with this recommendation and questioned why <br /> the Council would push items to the end of the agenda. She did not believe this action was <br /> transparent in nature yet now items were trying to be hidden late in the day so people could leave. <br /> She believed the pulled Consent Calendar items should be discussed under Item 9 like they <br /> always were. <br /> Councilmember Fabel indicated he concurred with the recommendations of Councilmember <br /> Rousseau and Councilmember Monson. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Fabel seconded a <br /> motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended moving Item 11B before <br /> 11A and discussing all pulled Consent Calendar items prior to Item 12. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested Item 10 be discussed after Item 11. <br /> Mayor Grant supported this suggestion. <br /> City Administrator Perrault reported the Public Hearings had to be held prior to discussing <br /> Items 11 A and 1113. <br /> The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant opposed). <br /> 2. TCAAP/RICE CREEK COMMONS UPDATE <br /> City Administrator Perrault stated since the last City Council meeting, the JDA had their first <br /> meeting of the year on January 2nd, at that meeting they approved their 2024 schedule and <br /> received updates on the infrastructure work at RCC, the traffic study, the energy advisory <br /> committee and reviewed the 2024 roadmap and development agreement schedule. At tonight's <br /> meeting, Council will be reviewing the TRC changes and as part of the discussion the preliminary <br /> traffic study results will be highlighted. For the infrastructure update, the County is going to be <br /> seeking a consultant to complete the design of the spine road and associated trunk utilities. Under <br /> their current plan, they estimate the spine road and associated infrastructure won't be complete <br /> until the end of 2027; however, this will depend on a variety of factors. That said, the developer is <br /> also researching what aspects could be done privately. The County is still working on selecting an <br /> energy consultant, and is expected to approve a contract sometime in January. For future advisory <br /> meetings, the advisory committee will be meeting likely once a month, while Staff will meet more <br /> often to discuss the details that will make up the development agreement. The energy committee <br /> will likely meet soon after the consultant is selected. Regarding Outlot A, the County Board is <br /> meeting tomorrow in closed session to discuss the sale of that property, it is expected details of <br /> the potential buyer will be released sometime in January. Lastly, the Council at its worksession <br /> earlier today discussed a concept plan by Maplewood Development Companies, the winner of the <br /> GSA auction. They are looking to prepare the Primer Tracer site for a future industrial use, but <br /> would be subject to Council's consideration of rezoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.