My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-27-1987
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
CC 04-27-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:09 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:51:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 27, <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />. <br />1987 <br /> <br />ST. LIGHT (CONT'D) Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council supports <br />the Public Safety/Works Committee recommendation for <br />denial of the street light request, at the intersection of Prior and Jerrold, <br />based on the rationale listed in the Committee Minutes of 4-16-87 and, <br />furthermore, that Council recommends the residents pursue the option of a <br />private security light at that location. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />HOUSE NUMBERING Council was referred to PS/W Committee Minutes <br />(4-16-87), recommending the preparation of "door <br />hanaers" explaining the importance of visible house o\llllbers and the pbn for <br />distribution of all Arden Hills residents whose homes are inadequately <br />identified. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council direct the <br />Public Safety/Works Committee and Administrative staff to prepare the "door <br />hangers" explaining the importance of visible house numbers. Motion carried <br />unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />FIRE STATION #4 Council was referred to PS/W Committee minutes <br />(4-16-87), relative to the extent of participation with <br />Shoreview in Fire Station #4. Committee consensus was <br />that Arden Hills Council consider participating only in the pruchase of an <br />aerial truck and consider purchasing a parcel of land in the north end of Arden <br />Hills (preferably next to the Public Works Building) for use as a future fire <br />station. It was noted that the Committee determined the purchase of land <br />essential should Shoreview elect to have its own fire department. <br /> <br />REPORT ON ISO RATING Paul Malone reviewed for Council the effect of ISO <br />Insurance Ratings on the City insurance premi\lllls. He <br />explained how he had attempted to determine justification of expenditures for <br />new equipment, in terms of benefits. Essentially the ISO rating system runs <br />from one to ten; one being the best rating, ten the worst. He explained how the <br />point ratings affected commercial properties insurance premiums; noting that <br />the amount of money saved by decreasing the ISO rating is not substantial. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Malone advised that the ISO rating for the City was originally done in 1975 and <br />updated in 1980, using the 1975 data and brought into the current rating <br />system. There are three classification categories, our rating was 6 (49.37 <br />total points). The categories are: 1. Alarms - of a possible 10 pts.; we <br />received 4 pts., 2. Fire Department - 50 pts. available; we received 19.36. <br />3. Water - 40 pts. available; we received 34.87. <br /> <br />Malone pointed out that additional points could be gained on improvements that <br />have already been made since 1975. He advised that he and the Fire Chief were <br />going to compile a current point rating using up-to-date information. <br /> <br />Council was referred to a diagram which displayed the radius of coverage from <br />each of the proposed fire station locations. Malone noted the difference in . <br />coverage for the Village with a centrally located station versus the Island <br />Lake Site. <br /> <br />Councilmembers commended Malone on his presentation and thanked him for the <br />information. <br /> <br />REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR <br /> <br />Council was referred to Raddatz's memorandum (4-24-87) <br />requesting the City extend the watermain on property <br />owned by him. Raddatz noted that he had discussed the <br />Engineer, who would draw up plans, under the City's guidelines, <br />project. The project costs .would be reimbursed by Raddatz. <br /> <br />REQ. WATERMAIN <br />EXTENSION HWY 10 <br /> <br />matter with the <br />and inspect the <br /> <br />Council suggested that Raddatz submit a development agreement for review by the <br />City Attorney and return to Council for final approval. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />the request for a watermain extension on Old Highway 10, as outlined in the <br />memorandum from Public Works Supervisor dated 4-24-87, authorize plans and <br />specifications be drawn, and furthermore, that Raddatz submit a development ... <br />agreement for review by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0). . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.