My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 03-09-1987
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
CC 03-09-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:09 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:51:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, March 9, 1987 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Miller noted that a retaining wall, existing between the two properties, would <br />also require a variance; he advised that matter should be discussed as a <br />separate issue. <br /> <br />Charlotte Spang, 4183 Norma Avenue, explained that she has incurred expenses <br />because of the improper survey of the lots; she asked if the builder would be <br />charged a penalty for the errOr. <br /> <br />Council advised Mrs. Spange it would be her responsibility to pursue civil <br />recourse for reimbursement of her expenses. <br /> <br />Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Case No. 87-02 A & B, 4173 and 4183 Norma Avenue, as requested. Motion carried <br />unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />VARIANCE FOR <br />RETAINING WALL <br />4183 NORMA AVE <br /> <br />Planner Miller explained that the encroachment of the <br />retaining wall owned by Spangs, 4183 Norma Avenue, is a <br />self-created situation, and that the Spangs have been <br />negotiating the purchase of an easement from the owners <br />of 4195 Norma Avenue. Miller further stated if an easement cannot be obtained, <br />the retaining wall will have to be relocated; he recommended a 3-foot variance <br />be granted for the retaining wall, which would allow Spangs to reconstruct the <br />wall at the property line if the easement is not obtained. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council asked why this variance request was not part of the setback variance <br />application and if residents should have received notice of this matter. <br /> <br />Miller noted that the application for the variance from setback requirements <br />for the homes was initiated by the builder; the encroachment of the retaining <br />wall was identified after the application had been made and this variance <br />request is from the Spangs. He advised this is not an unusual situation; in <br />the past other variances have been identified after an application has been <br />submitted. Miller explained that notifying the adjacent property owners is not <br />a requirement in the variance application process. <br /> <br />Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Council <br />approve the request for a 3-foot setback variance for the existing retaining <br />wall, that exists between the homes at 4183 and 4195 Norma Av_nue. Motion <br />carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />After discussion of past policy reI fines for violation of Zoning Ordinance <br />requirements, Council consensus was that the developer of this addition has an <br />excellent record in the City and that this error was probably unintentional. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CASE #87-05; MINOR <br />SUBDIV. 3280 LAKE <br />JOHANNA BOULEY ARD <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's report (2-24-87) and <br />Planning Commission minutes of 3-4-87.recommending <br />approval of the Minor Subdivision at 3280 Lake Johanna <br />Boulevard. <br /> <br />Planner Miller stated the applicant is proposing to split 10 feet from the <br />south edge of the vacant lot and convey that strip of land to the adjacent <br />property owner. He advised that the propsed lot split and consolidation <br />improves the south lot without detriment to the north lot. Miller further <br />stated that he recommends approval be conditioned upon administrative review <br />and approval of the deeds prior to recording with the County. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Case No. 87-05, Lot Split/Consolidation at 3280 Lake Johanna Blvd., as <br />submitted by the applicant Michael Hill, contingent upon administrative review <br />and approval of the deeds prior to recording with the County. Motion carried <br />unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />CASE #87-03; SUP <br />VALENTINE HILLS <br />SCHOOL ADDITION <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's report (2-24-87) and <br />Planning Commission minutes of 3-4-87, reI application <br />for a Special Use Permit to construct 4 additional <br />classrooms at the Valentine Hills Elementary School. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.