Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..::- <br />- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL WTING <br />Village of Arden Hills <br />Monday, January 12, 1987 <br />Villalle Hall <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Pureuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to <br />order at 7100 p.m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Pr..ent I <br /> <br />Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Dala Hicks, Gary Peck <br />and Thomas Sather. <br />Nancy Hanaen. <br />Treasurer Donald Lamb, Public Works Supervisor Robert <br />Raddatz. Clerk Adminiatrator Patricia Morriaon and Deputy <br />Clerk Catherine Iago. <br /> <br />Abaentl <br />1.180 Pre..ntl <br /> <br />Closed MeetinR - Labor NeRotiations - 7:00 to 8.00 p.m. <br />Council discussed labor Rellotiations. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the Minutes of Special <br />Joint Council Meeting Arden Hills/Shoreview of December 27, 1986, the regular <br />Council meeting of December 29, 1986, and the Special Council meeting of <br />January 2, 1987 as subalitted. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />Business from Floor <br />None. <br /> <br />EdRewater Eatates - Reaueat to Allow Occupancy Prior to ReceivinR FlowaRe <br />EasAmAnt <br />Council wa. referred to memorandum from Planner Miller (1-8-87), explaininll the <br />certificate of occupancy for the apartment building under construction at <br />Edllewater E.tates should not be taaued until a recordable consent agrelllll8nt ls <br />obtained from the US Fish and Wildlife Service to allow construction on the <br />flowage easement which encumbers lata 6, 7 and 8 of block 1. <br /> <br />Gerald McGuire, ownar of the development and his attorney, Tom Zappia, were <br />present to answer any queaUona from Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn reviewed the City'a concerns relstive to Lot 7; .assurance that <br />the special assessments for lot 7 may be spread to the other lots in the <br />subdivision if the conssnt agreement is not received by the date of the <br />assesement hearing, and, a.aurance that lot 7, if not buildable, will be <br />maintained ,by the property owner in the future. <br /> <br />Hicks noted that McGuire had shown a preference for the Planner's first <br />alternative, in the event the consent agreement is not obtained, of <br />conaolidating lot 7 with lot 9 of block 1 (townhouse development lot) aud <br />havinll it remain as permanent open apace. He sUlllleated the .econd .lternative <br />of withholdinll the .ale of lot. 6 and 8 until consent .lIr....nt i. received and <br />if the agreement cannot be obtainad, lot 7 could be aplit and consolidated with <br />adjacant lots 6 and 8. Hick. atated the second alternative appears to be better <br />for maintenance purpose. and would be more attractive in the development. <br /> <br />McGuire, after discussion with Zappia, all reed with Hick. that the second <br />alternative would be preferable if the conaent agreement is not obtained. <br /> <br />Hicks asked if lots 6 and 8 had been sold, and if development of those lots <br />would precede the townhouse development. He sugge.ted the lot split could be <br />attached a. a requirement upon .ale of lot. 6 and 8 if the developer hea the <br />oPportunity to sell them before obtaininll the con.ent agreement. <br /> <br />Zappia stated they have not been aold, but could be prior to development of the <br />townhouses. He agreed with Hick'a augllestion and questioned if the <br />consolidation/.plit could be tied to the .ale of the latter lot, beinll either 6 <br />or .8, impoaing lea. reatriction on the aale of the lata. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn questioned if that would require an agreement to be drafted by <br />Zappia. <br /> <br />( <br />