Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . , <br /> Public Hearing MinuTes - December 13, 1966 - continued <br /> Page .;-IH'<3e <br /> Ted Lindbom, 4008 North Falrvlew Avenue - commended the Counc I I and <br /> Planning Commission on the proposed zoning ordinance and sta"j-ed, <br /> as a home ouner, would rather seo brick buildings and not block <br /> consTruction. <br /> . ROGER Reiling, owner of Arden Center, \1hy change his lot to residential? <br /> Mr. Dale: '~our commercial areas remain as non-conforming use; would be <br /> impossible to tear down and rebuild - not good place for service <br /> s,"'ation. <br /> Attorney Courtney: the problem is you have to make an overall change for <br /> the bEltter. This particular corner really no'l suitable for a station. <br /> John Sull ivan, 1429 Skiles Lane, comments on Mr. RId I r ng' s comment; be 11 eves <br /> Planning Commission has made an un\1arranted a,.sumption and questions <br /> their decision f n .j"h i s case.. <br /> Richard Kiene, 1516 Arden Place - why Reiling station area rezoned ar.d <br /> consideration being given to another service station at County Road <br /> E and Highway 51? <br /> ~1ayor Nethercut: Station has been approved for con~truction - there Is <br /> only one residence In thl~ particular area. <br /> Mr. Kiene: believes this is a mistake - is tired of looking at gas stations <br /> Mr. Rell! nil: this station will affect more than one ~ouse with area to <br /> the south zoned residential. <br /> Carl Dale: Houses \1111 not be adjoining G~B zoning. <br /> Robert Brom, 1847 County Road 0, objects to any type 01 Commercial structure <br /> at the corner of County Road 0 and New Brighton Road; tris corner should be <br /> residential. He stated that aven at the present time clJnstant policing 15 <br /> necessary at the crossing for the school chi Idren. <br /> P~r. Sullivan: bel laves protection should be given every present use - at <br /> least lolhen It has been In existence for 20 years an~ where business <br /> continues the use Is Justified. <br /> Attorney Courtney: Do you believe the area should be comm~rclal forever? <br /> By leaving this area zoned commercial, it opens up oth~r business for <br /> the area. The Planning Commission must make judgement and the decision <br /> was made on future uses. <br /> . ~k. Kiene: should consider residential areas near these comm~rclal location <br /> Mr. Ronald Herrick, 1660 lake lane: believes the people want tIe station <br /> across the street. <br /> Mayor Nethercut: reason for public hearing Is to hear the resld~nts' views. <br /> Attorney Courtney: This particular piece could be zoned commercl~I, but <br /> this ~ould be spot zoning; Planning Consultants are very muc. opposed <br /> to spot zoning. <br /> 141" . Dale: Most comunltles don't spot zone; the existing layout of ihe stree <br /> should be done this ~ay at present - doubts If a station could be re- <br /> built on this location if the present one were demolished bacao.e of <br /> the building code considering set backs, etc). <br /> I~r, Colestock: Rosevllle to the south of this station Is zoned comm<rcla!. <br /> Are 7hey going to change to residential? We need service statl01s. <br /> Colestock requested definition of service stations and objected ~? the <br /> definition in the proposed ordinance. <br /> ~Ir. Dale: Rosevllle at the present time Is maldng a co m plete study of r.'ZOi1 <br /> -3- <br />