My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-31-1966
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1966
>
CC 05-31-1966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:12 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 3:15:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FINDINGS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. The commercial area is growing on a parcel-by-parcel basis with no <br />clear indication as to what the total results might be in the future. <br /> <br />2. Based upon similar situations noted elsewhere, there is a strong probabilily <br />that the total area development will be less than desirable to both the <br />Communily and the land owners involved. The primary danger is that of <br />new, higher qualily developments to the east and north which could be <br />severe competition in future years. Hence, it is in the best interests <br />of both the Communily and the properly owners involved to establish some <br />suitable long-range goals for proper and competitive development,. <br /> <br />3. The survey has revealed the following negative development conditions: <br /> <br />a) The general appearance of the area is not up to present day standards. <br />Proper landscaping is probably the most needed feature. Structural <br />design is only "average" and there is little to make a lasting impressian <br />upon customers or the general pL.blici the area lacks an architectural <br />"mage." At present, development is a dbconnected patchwork of <br />rather plain buildings and parking areas. Power lines, vacant areas, <br />open storage, obsolete buildings and sheds, and other features also <br />detract from the appearance of the areCl. <br /> <br />b) The area lacks a sense of unilyi individual merchants in such areas <br />must rely upon their individual promotional efforts and reputation <br />without the added benefit of area identification. For example, <br />individual merchants in Southdale can obtain business from the <br />customer attracting power of the area identification and amenities <br />offered in a unified center. <br /> <br />c) Future traffic volumes on Counly Road E will be much greater. The <br />road will eventually require at least four moving lanes to accommodate <br />the volume potential. Access drives off Count}. Road E for each <br />development could lead to a traffic congestion and hazardous situation <br />detrimental to the public and the commercial interests. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />d) As the area develops, provision must be made for pedestrian circulation. <br />While customer interchange will be limited due to the nature of the <br />district, there are various reasons why pedestrian circulation must be <br />considered an important factor. Such reasons include non-business <br />traffic, school children, local-non-business pedestrians, a unily design <br />feature, and others. <br /> <br />e) An "average" environment will not be adequate to attract high qualily <br />developments that may othelWise find the area quite atlTactive due to its <br />central location and generally good transportation access. Hence, there <br />may be a tendency for later developments to be of even less desirable qualily. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.