My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
03-11-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 9:54:53 AM
Creation date
3/7/2024 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Easement Vacation Request <br />The Applicant is requesting to partially vacate the existing drainage and utility easement to allow <br />for the expansion of an existing deck in the rear yard. The Certificate of Survey showing the area <br />of the request for partial vacation of the Drainage and Utility Easement is shown in Attachment B. <br />The proposed deck would be 448 square feet in place of a 370 square foot deck which has started <br />to deteriorate. The proposed location of the deck would encroach on the current drainage and utility <br />easement. The proposed vacation is for a triangle at the southwest of the existing buildable pad on <br />the plat. The proposed would not vacate or encroach on any of the conservation easement. <br />Proposed <br />easement <br />vacation area <br />Proposed <br />deck area <br />within <br />existing <br />easement <br />I <br />0 <br />� ry <br />A <br />I N <br />00 <br />4 <br />r� <br />24.49— r <br />3'2 --e <br />zz.z <br />+ ry e., r <br />f. <br />J EXISTING <br />i . HauSF f <br />a' 'sue DECK z° L^LIYI 07 <br />78.1 ��~r�f� g7 alb 5'r+ <br />S <br />Ln Y7 <br />The Public Works Director has reviewed the proposed easement vacation and provided a memo in <br />support of the vacation request (Attachment Q. It has been verified that the proposed area to be <br />vacated would not impact ongoing maintenance or functionality of an adjacent storm sewer outlet <br />with the grading plan as submitted by the Applicant. Staff has shared the proposed easement <br />vacation with representatives of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources and Rice Creek <br />Watershed District and the proposal did not raise concerns. The Applicant confirmed with Rice <br />Creek Watershed District that additional permitting from that entity would not be required. A <br />request for a Vacation of Easement requires a public hearing before the City Council. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.