My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
03-11-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 9:50:52 AM
Creation date
3/12/2024 3:48:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION-MARCH 11, 2024 12 <br /> Mayor Grant thought this could be looked at as a vegetative fence, and fences have permanency <br /> in placement in law. <br /> Councilmember Monson didn't know why they were singling out this one landowner, she would <br /> like to move forward with what he has and talk about the policy. <br /> Councilmember Holden would like the trees removed, that was what was done in the past and he <br /> chose to replant them. There is a tree planted every three feet, which means they weren't planting <br /> to enhance the park, they were planting to create a fence and expand their back yard. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe said in the letter sent in 2019 to approximately 20 <br /> property owners, one of the remedies was to remove trees and vegetation from public land and <br /> noted that it was strictly prohibited. That was one of three notices that were sent to this address. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau asked if they told him to remove the trees would they go back to all <br /> of the other houses and tell them to remove their encroachments? <br /> City Administrator Perrault said they would follow similar steps as this case if they had a <br /> complaint. His guess was that if they tell him to remove the trees, someone will walk the trail and <br /> let the City know about other violations. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau preferred that he take out about half the trees and they come to some <br /> other type of agreement with the other property owners. She thought they should tighten up what <br /> they haven't done in the past but maybe not treat this issue and future issues in the same way. <br /> Councilmember Holden said there are other issues by Cummings and Perry parks, fire pits <br /> shouldn't be on City property. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe explained there was one notice that went to all <br /> property owners along the trail that said the things they allow or do not allow on City property. <br /> There was a second notice sent to this property owner based on a complaint to remove a fence. <br /> The trees were put up and a third letter was sent telling him to remove the trees because he wasn't <br /> allowed to plant on park property. <br /> Councilmember Holden said it was a six-foot fence so he's just replacing it with vegetation. <br /> Councilmember Monson there are people with more permanent issues on this trail. She didn't <br /> want to spend the time to run down this landowner and then going to every landowner on the trail. <br /> She felt they should decide what to do with this landowner and draw a line with a policy going <br /> forward. It will be difficult to treat the past and the future equally. She thought they should just <br /> snap the line and move on. <br /> Councilmember Holden said they've made other people move fences when they encroached in <br /> the past. <br /> Councilmember Fabel thought if they had a red line, the City could say no, you can't encroach <br /> on City property, get it off of there or we'll do it for you and charge you. That would be a clear <br /> policy that staff would have no difficulty enforcing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.