Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . ALtg"s t 17, 1990 <br /> To: AH Council <br /> Frotn: Ton1 Sather <br /> Re: i\ssessment Policy <br /> Based on the reeon1111endatiol1s of TvrSA and the finanee COlTIIllittee I offer <br /> nl)' thoughts. T will list J11Y concerns in the order of the Finance COlTIlnittee <br /> 111erno dated 6j28/i)O. <br /> J) in full agreement with Fe ,md IvlSA <br /> 2) in agreetnent w'ith Fe' proposaJ <br /> 3)Prefer FC proposal <br /> 4)OK <br /> 5) ..Agree \./ith FC, however burtl,t:.'n is on the council to update" fce's regularly. <br /> 6) OK <br /> 7) OK - <br /> 8') FC proposal is good, ho\vever, llU.::e the "collector" an::8. asseSSl11ent idea <br /> . propDsed by !vISA. <br /> 9) Prefer FC recolllluendatiol1 <br /> 10) I feel that all appurtenances shDuld be assessed al 100%. <br /> This leads to a Council Polk)" decision a_s to 'weather side"\\ralks <br /> or other appurten<":'illCf'S shou~ld be included 8S 'sfandard' on <br /> reconstruct.ion projects. <br /> 1J) \\1110 \l,,:iJI \vrite the hardship deferral polley? <br /> Finance Conlnlittee <br /> f'ijia <br /> 1"2)01< <br /> LJ) ??"???? <br /> J.4) 110'';': du we do this? Doe,,; Fe' ll1t'21il aS5es,sing only "our" cost <br /> or the cost of the p.nllre project? <br /> 15) Could the J..lolicy to devlE:llc be different for each zoning classification? <br /> Can \ve identify potential problenl areas no-w? <br /> . <br />