Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> r\:ltJ/tl\ <br /> ~/ <br /> /\UgllSt 17. J990 <br /> . To: /\.H. Coundlmembers and Staff <br /> From: Tom Sather <br /> Re: '91 Budget <br /> I regret that Business has called me out of town on Monday. I offer the following <br /> as my thoughts for the budgets final form. I went through the cuts proposed on <br /> Wednesday by Gary and can support most of staff's recommendations. <br /> Mayor/Council <br /> 351 printing 7500 <br /> Elections <br /> 570 optiscan 6000 <br /> Adnlinistration <br /> 301 audit fees 1000 <br /> Gen. Gov't <br /> 223 Bldg. grounds 10000 <br /> 580 Inisc,equip. 10000 <br /> Police/Animal Control <br /> 313 RCSD 12000 <br /> 550 CSO ,,,,,,hide 7000 .' <br /> . Inspection <br /> 300 Bldg Insp" 8000 <br /> 317 Rendering Plant 2,)00 <br /> Streets <br /> 40R Pavement rngmt. 100000 <br /> 550 ..~uton1otive 5000 <br /> 580 Misc. Equip. 8125 <br /> Park Maint <br /> 550 Automotive 15000 <br /> 580 Mise" f2quip. 1625 <br /> Fire Proteet:inn <br /> I'd propose splitting line 314 into operating and capital <br /> Based on vv-hat the fire departznent COlnes back with on <br /> hlonc1ay, I'd suggest the follov,."ing: <br /> 314 Operating Expense 170000 <br /> 314/\ Capital 30000 <br /> This is under the figure of 210000 that we suggested on <br /> \"~lednesday a~) being acceptablt~, but I sL~~.;pect that as <br /> we see the actual nUlnbers that they present .on f..rlonday! <br /> their data \vill show far less actual operating expen5C' than <br /> they are requesting in their budget. <br /> Finance IJirector <br /> . /",.5 discllssed 011 Wednesday, I'd reconl111end that 150/0 of the <br /> Finance Ijirector salarylbenefits be charged to the general fund. <br />