CCP 08-27-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

APPLICANT'S NOTES: . lhe of the prop(-?r"ty All buildings are being proposed for the east~?!rn half of the p rDp(:~r ty ~ This i'" du(-? to the f"c t tha t the I,.'~estern half ~ contains very poor so i l conditions... In 1986, a stuely was done by GME consultants for a sin'lle story building. They recornrtlended concrete-f i lleel pipe p j L i n ~I~) set BO' deE!p in or- d~~ r to provide en(JU 'Jh S\lpport. Tl1 I s {ll~1< i~'S buildin., con- struct i em on that half clf t h,~ site Ll neCOnO(ll i c.:il ... There are a L ~50 sani"tary "nd s t Clflll S(-?\tJ(::!r l i nf.0S crossing tile I,.\IE'S t e r '() half of the f'roperty, slgnif1c:,',ntly 1 i fol it i ng the p L ~~C(*{llent of per ifl~':l l1f:?-l1 t bui ldin"Js. Review of air-supported structun?s. F'rec:enclence t.<Ja-::; set with the Arelen 1-1 ill s f\ac''luet Club re- <jardin9 a i r-slll'ported structures.. I;n In it I a 1 P(~ r (1\ i 't VJas is- sued by the eity, "i th a stipulation It b €.~ rev i (?,t.\IE.~d every 10 years.. A renewal of that permit was issued, " 1 thou gl1 tha t business t.HI,' i na teel before actually u't i 1 i zing it. I would a 'jf(0e to the S.:':lrlle st i p\lla't ion. but sl10u l d not be re''lU ired to replace the bubble with a perfllaneni.' builcling. H is {Ill' s i )1-- . c(,?re j n"h=nt to replace the bubbles ,,' i th permanent buildings, but the t i ill i n9 of such rep 1 acef'1ent must be a business deci- sion fila de frol'l " financiaL perspective. L i gh t i ng. BottI tl'1 "1 clriginal and the I"odified site plan ca 1l for the re-use of exi~3ting l i qh t i n'l on the property. These l j 'Jh t,~ are currently located along a sidewalk that j 0 i n'S> CDe to the Arden WO(J cis office building. Ou r proposal is to us~~ these L i gh ts along the sid~,~.alk for the new building, well OVE~r 100 feet a''',hllY frolll Lexington. They a r €~ Vf:.1ry lo\. intensity lights, and will b €.~ lIlounted B' above q r a de.. The'l a r(,? not intended to providf2 III U 1,\ I na t i on to t h.~ P--=i rl tha t of I_ex i n,~ton Avenue} and a 5' berm is p r()posed be'twef211 t h "~ parking lot and L.exlngton. Therefore, tt', <) 1 i ..h ts wilt not have any effG,ct on traffic. AelelitiCl\1al lights for t h €~ parking lot are p ropc)~;€:.\cl in the n(::!w s i 'h~ pl.anl ~3 n d 1,IJi II 1J,? a R '~h(Je-box 11. t'll,e of l Uil) i ria i re :; i (I) i La r to that of ~lr e1en ~JQC)c1s } Burgf~r King} C'J'(J.d GDodyear. Th i ", "' ill pro..... ide a consistency r(;(jard i n(,3 park inq lot L j gh t.;:, . ill D"ng Lex i n~ltC))i f~V(.:~nlJ e. There is no zoning T"E"=LU i T"~':ffl€-:nt regard i n~l tn i n i If,U(J) lighting for park in'] areas} as noted by the city planner in his re- port da t €,)d ,)u 1 y 1 j, 1990. 1 - - - - .---. - --