CCP 11-13-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'" MINUI'FS OF THE ARDEN HILlS RmJIAR PIANNING mMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1990, 7: 30 P.M. - CITY HALL CALL 'IO ORDER Pursuant to clue call and notice thereof, Chair Probst . called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL TIle roll being called the following members were present: Chair Dermis Probst, Members David Carlson, Scott Petersen, Barbara piotrowski, Dorothy Zehm, Dan Ashbach, Jeanne Winiecki and Robert Woodb.lrn. Absent: Raymond McGraw and Robert curtis. Also present: Planner John Bergly, Clerk Administrator Gary Berger, and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. APPROVE MINUI'FS Member Zehm proposed a co=ection to the 10-3-90 Planning Minutes, page 3, 4th paragraph, should reflect "Members Zehm and winiecki" as withdrawing the motion and second. winiecki moved, seconded by Zehrn, to approve the October 3, Planning Commission Minutes, as co=ected. Motion carried unanimously. (8-0) CASE #90-09; Chair Probst acJmowledged the request fram Dennis Foster REQUFSI' DEIAY to delay review of case #90-09, site Plan Review for 'IO DECEMBER "What-A Racquet Sports Club" application to the December PLANNING AGENDA Planning Commission Meeting; received n-2-90. Commission directed staff to notify Mr'. Foster that the deadline for suhnission of materials for the December meeting is November 13. CASE #90-16; Planner Bergly reviewed his report dated n -7-90, FRONT & REAR YARD relative to the application for a front yard variance for . VARIANCES, 1388 garage addition and rear yard variance for an addition to ARDEN OAKS DRIVE, the residence at 1388 Arden Oaks Drive, George and MR. & MRS. HAUCK Barbara Hauck. Bergly stated two variances are requested: 1. Front yard variance of 8.2 feet to allow expansion of a two-car garage to a three-car garage on the west end of the structure. 2. Rear yard variance of 2.4 feet to allow construction of a 14 by 16 foot addition to the south side of the house. TIle Planner suggested that separate actions be taken on the two variances. Planner Bergly reviewed the findings listed on page 1 of his report, relating to the front yard variance request: 1. TIle subject lot is a comer lot and a minimum front yard setback of 40 ft. is required on both street frontages. 'Ihe applicant proposes to construct an addition to the existing garage that would leave a front yard setback of 31.8 ft. fram the west street property line; this would require a variance of 8.2 ft. fram the mini1num front yard setback requirement. 2. TIle existing front yard on the west end of the garage is 43.3 feet; so a 3.3 ft. extension of the existing garage would be allowed without a variance. 'Ihis would provide f= a 31-foot-wide garage. . 3. TIle existing garage is 28 feet wide. with a 12 ft. addition as proposed, the overall length of the new garage would be then be 40 feet.