Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ----- <br /> Minutes of the Arden Hills Council Worksession/Budget Hearing, 11-19-90 .. - . <br /> Page 2 <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGi Mayor Sather opene::l the Public Hearing at 6:00 p.m., for <br /> 1991 PROPOSED the purpose of reviewing the Arden Hills 1991 proposed . <br /> BUDGET Budget, as require::l by the state of Minnesota, Truth in <br /> Taxation law. <br /> Deputy Clerk Iago verifie::l publication of the Notice of Hearing in the st. Paul <br /> pioneer Press on Wednesday, November 14, 1990. <br /> Clerk Administrator Berger reviewe::l the propY.3e::l 1991 Budget Revenue and <br /> Expenditure Funds and comparisons of both funds from previous years. He noted the <br /> loss of local goverrunent aid from the state of Minnesota and reviewe::l the effect <br /> of the loss on the revenue funds. <br /> Council advised those in attendance the state has shifted aid from cities to <br /> school districts and encourage::l all present to also attend the public hearings <br /> schedule::l by the school district and at the county. 'Ihere was discussion relative <br /> to the division of tax dollar between the three entities and Council explained <br /> that the school district is the recipient of the largest portion of the taxpayer <br /> dollari only 15% of the tax dollar rebJrns to the city. <br /> Council explaine::l the budget increase is approxlinately six percent, which <br /> basically reflects the Consmner Price Index cost of living increase. <br /> Mayor sather acknowleclge::l receipt of the two letters stating opposition to the <br /> proposed rudgeti Charles Chenoweth, 1898 Noble Road, and Andrew Wolf, 1347 Arden <br /> view Drive. He stated he receive::l a telephone call from Hans Molenar, resident, <br /> stating opposition to the proposed budget. . <br /> Mayor Sather aske::l if there was anyone present who wishe::l to be heard either in <br /> favor of or oppY.3e::l to the 1991 proposed budget. <br /> Several unidentifie::l members of the audience expressed opposition to the proposed <br /> rudget and the following issues were discussed: <br /> -Questioned the expenditure items which indicate a ten percent increase; <br /> Administrative Office, Public Works/streets, and Park Maintenance. <br /> Council explained the increase in Administrative Office is largely due to <br /> proposed salary increases for personnel in conjunction with requirements imposed <br /> by the Comparable Worth law and the addition of a new staff position. 'Ihe Public <br /> Works Streets fund is increased due to propY.3e::l irrplementation of the Pavement <br /> Management Plan. staff advised a plan was initiated and streets were rated for <br /> patching, overlay and reconstruction; the plan will be irrplemented over a pericx:l <br /> of time and monies are rudgeted each year for this purpose. 'Ihe Park Maintenance <br /> increase reflects proposed purchasing of equipment. <br /> -Questione::l increase in Police and Fire protection. <br /> Council advised the city contracts with Ramsey County Sheriff for police services <br /> and Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department for fire protection; these contracts <br /> are non-negotiable and the costs per capita are lower than most metropolitan <br /> suhrrbs . <br /> . <br />