CCP 02-10-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 2-10-92 Page 3 TILLER (Conti d) Engineer Maurer reviewed how the assessment rate is . calculated, based on total project cost and assessable front footage. He also reviewed the tentative schedule for completion of the project in 1992. Acting Mayor Malone asked if there was anyone present who wished to be heard either in favor of or opposed to the proposed :iJtprovement. Gene Ward, 1242 Tiller Lane, questioned if the soil samples were taken after preparation of the initial feasibility report. He noted the easterly portion of Tiller Lane is in poor condition, however, the westerly portion of the street is in gocd condition. Ward stated he would prefer to have the westerly portion of street upgraded with bituminous overlay, rather than reconstructed. Engineer Maurer explained the soil conditions were determined after the initial feasibility study, as part of the preparation of the detailed plans and specifications for the project. Carl Norquist, 1171 Tiller Lane, questioned if a =rparison study of the traffic on Ingerson Road versus Tiller Lane has been donei it appears that traffic is heavier on Ingerson Road. He also questioned if driveway aprons are included in the :iJtprovement costs. Engineer Maurer stated he is unaware of any =ent traffic counts on Tiller since it is a County road. He advised the costs for driveway aprpms are included in the :iJtprovement and materials will match the existing driveway surface on the . property . Dick VolJanann, 1102 Carlton Drive, advised he owns property adjacent to Tiller Lane and questioned how assessment of his property will be determined. He also questioned how closely the esti1na.ted costs reflect the actual bid amount for the project. Engineer Maurer explained the esti1na.ted costs are based on utilization of construction bids f= projects completed last year and discussions with contractors as to what to expect for price in=eases in 1992. He advised it does not appear there will be a significant in=ease in price over projects completed in 1991. VolJanann stated Carlton Drive was recently resurfaced and questioned if resurfacing, rather than reconstruction of Tiller Lane, would be feasible. He also questioned if Carlton is scheduled for recontruction in the future. The Engineer explained the major difference between the two streets is the subsurface soils and the nature of the street failure on Tiller Lane. He stated an overlay is actually no better than the surface on which it is installedi Tiller Lane would not hold the bituminous overlay, based on the existing conclition of the street. He further advised that Carlton Drive will be reviewed and rated in the Pavement Management Program and may require sealcoating in a few years, however, a reconstruction project does not appear to be warranted in the foreseeable future. . Larry Kahnke, 1315 Tiller Lane, noted the feasibility report indicates """",,,,srnents may be spread over a five to ten year periodi questioned what percentage of interest will be charged to the assessment.