My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-10-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 02-10-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:46 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 3:53:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 2-10-92 <br /> Page 3 <br /> TILLER (Conti d) Engineer Maurer reviewed how the assessment rate is <br /> . calculated, based on total project cost and assessable <br /> front footage. He also reviewed the tentative schedule for completion of the <br /> project in 1992. <br /> Acting Mayor Malone asked if there was anyone present who wished to be heard <br /> either in favor of or opposed to the proposed :iJtprovement. <br /> Gene Ward, 1242 Tiller Lane, questioned if the soil samples were taken after <br /> preparation of the initial feasibility report. He noted the easterly portion of <br /> Tiller Lane is in poor condition, however, the westerly portion of the street is <br /> in gocd condition. Ward stated he would prefer to have the westerly portion of <br /> street upgraded with bituminous overlay, rather than reconstructed. <br /> Engineer Maurer explained the soil conditions were determined after the initial <br /> feasibility study, as part of the preparation of the detailed plans and <br /> specifications for the project. <br /> Carl Norquist, 1171 Tiller Lane, questioned if a =rparison study of the traffic <br /> on Ingerson Road versus Tiller Lane has been donei it appears that traffic is <br /> heavier on Ingerson Road. He also questioned if driveway aprons are included in <br /> the :iJtprovement costs. <br /> Engineer Maurer stated he is unaware of any =ent traffic counts on Tiller <br /> since it is a County road. He advised the costs for driveway aprpms are included <br /> in the :iJtprovement and materials will match the existing driveway surface on the <br /> . property . <br /> Dick VolJanann, 1102 Carlton Drive, advised he owns property adjacent to Tiller <br /> Lane and questioned how assessment of his property will be determined. He also <br /> questioned how closely the esti1na.ted costs reflect the actual bid amount for the <br /> project. <br /> Engineer Maurer explained the esti1na.ted costs are based on utilization of <br /> construction bids f= projects completed last year and discussions with <br /> contractors as to what to expect for price in=eases in 1992. He advised it does <br /> not appear there will be a significant in=ease in price over projects completed <br /> in 1991. <br /> VolJanann stated Carlton Drive was recently resurfaced and questioned if <br /> resurfacing, rather than reconstruction of Tiller Lane, would be feasible. He <br /> also questioned if Carlton is scheduled for recontruction in the future. <br /> The Engineer explained the major difference between the two streets is the <br /> subsurface soils and the nature of the street failure on Tiller Lane. He stated <br /> an overlay is actually no better than the surface on which it is installedi <br /> Tiller Lane would not hold the bituminous overlay, based on the existing <br /> conclition of the street. He further advised that Carlton Drive will be reviewed <br /> and rated in the Pavement Management Program and may require sealcoating in a few <br /> years, however, a reconstruction project does not appear to be warranted in the <br /> foreseeable future. <br /> . Larry Kahnke, 1315 Tiller Lane, noted the feasibility report indicates <br /> """",,,,srnents may be spread over a five to ten year periodi questioned what <br /> percentage of interest will be charged to the assessment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.