CCP 02-10-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 2-10-92 Page 13 KEITHSON (Cont'd) Malone moved, seconded by Growe, that Attorney Filla be . authorized to offer a stipulation when negotiating with for a pennanent drainage easement for Keithson pond area, that the property owner be allowed to recnnfigure or relocate the existing poneling area located on his property southwest of the Keithson area, when future development cx:::curs, provided that the pond retains the same storage capacity as the design outlined in the area storm drainage plans. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) Engineer Maurer suggested formal execution of the bid contract be held, pending further modifications to the plans. RES. #92-15; Council was referred to the Park Director's memorandum 1992 PARK/TRAIL dated 2-6-92, relating to the proposed 1992 Park and IMPROVEMENTS Trail Irrprovements. Park Director Buckley advised the Parks Connnittee reconunendations as outlined in his memorandum. He suggested engineering studies be completed for the trail paving project and field improvement projects at Perry and valentine Parks. Buckley reported on meetings with area residents to discuss the proposed improvements; five residents appeared to discuss the improvements. He indicated another meeting is proposed with the residents after the trail is staked for viewing. Council1nernber Malone questioned the necessity of a feasibility study, since this is a park improvement; usually the study is required when the improvement is . proposed f= assessment to residents. Buckley explained it is his understanding the feasibility study is requested to determine costs prior to advertisement f= bids. Engineer Maurer advised the feasibility study is the first step in the process for estimating the ecnnornic feasibility of a project; if Council is comfortable with the costs presented and the expenditure, it my be appropriate to eliminate this step and move to the preparation of plans ;;md specifications. Malone questioned if the Park Director contacted the engineer to inquire if the feasibility study was necessary for this project. Maurer explained the feasibility study was not discussed, only the proposed park improvements . Malone recalled this same discussion regarding the necessity of a feasibility study for the 1991 park improvements. 'Ihe Park Director stated he stands co=ected. Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to authorize the engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the 1992 Park and Trail Irrprovements. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) . Acting Mayor Mahowald suggested the Park Director hold another meeting with residents upon completion of the plans and specifications for this project. He questioned if the plans include screening along the pathway.