My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
04-08-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2024 2:41:08 PM
Creation date
4/5/2024 2:34:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION — MARCH 11, 2024 6 <br />City Administrator Perrault said ultimately the position as a City has been that if the <br />development halts the assessments would fall to the property owner which is Ramsey County. <br />So, the City shouldn't be put at financial risk if the development should cease to go forward or <br />stop half way through, and they wouldn't be stuck holding the debt for those improvements. <br />Mayor Grant has seen a number of iterations of the financials, as the JDA is working to solve <br />portions of them, are the financial consultant's hours being billed to the JDA or the County? <br />City Administrator Perrault said the consultant was the City's representative and her hours are <br />being billed to the City. <br />Mayor Grant said it's not surprising that Alatus comes across things, changes things, the City <br />changes things and the consultant keeps massaging the numbers so the bills keep coming in. <br />Councilmember Monson didn't agree with the whole concept that the Mayor thinks they're <br />blowing money to assess the economic liability of a project, that is not what they're doing. She'd <br />love to see what Ehlers was charged in all the years in the past if they're going to go down this <br />route and he was going to start saying they're overspending on insuring that the economics of the <br />City are what they are and however we assume it. They are trying not to put any undue risk on <br />the City, and to say they're spending too much money on the financial advisor who will ensure <br />they are doing just that, she didn't know what he was getting at but that's how she was <br />interpreting it. <br />Mayor Grant replied that was not what he was getting at. His comment was that they need to be <br />cognizant and watch that because they have gone through multiple iterations. He wasn't saying it <br />was a waste but something that needs to be watched. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if what they were talking about was reimbursable by the JDA. <br />City Administrator Perrault didn't believe it was. The recent iteration was looking at some of <br />the horizontal infrastructure that was laid out that's required to go forward by the County using <br />Kimley-Horn and Alatus' numbers. <br />Councilmember Holden said Ehler's numbers used to be billed to the JDA. <br />City Administrator Perrault said he could double check that but it was his understanding that <br />all of her work was charged to the City and Bruce's work was charged to the County. <br />Councilmember Rousseau was interested to know what they've been paying Ehlers. It had been <br />made very clear to her that people want to be sure that this project has financials in a safe and <br />secure place. <br />Councilmember Holden said she didn't hear anyone say let's not run the numbers when they <br />need to. <br />Mayor Grant said there was a park planned on the signed agreement, was it still planned? <br />City Administrator Perrault said the MOU park plan that was agreed to was still intended to be <br />honored, but they could request revisions or relook at the terms. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.