My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-09-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 03-09-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:51 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:38:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> --.- <br /> .- <br /> , <br /> I <br /> , <br /> Mayors, Managers, Clerks . <br /> Page 2 <br /> February 25, 1992 <br /> It is, of course, rather unlikely the legislature won't enact <br /> legislation correcting the problem resulting from the Governor's line <br /> item veto. But it could happen. Or, more likely, the programs <br /> included in the trust fund could be shifted around so less of the <br /> trust fund money would fund county programs. What would the counties <br /> do then? opt out, or continue their support of optional sales tax so <br /> that city property tax relief programs continue? <br /> Should the Legislature fail to adopt a new trust fund distribution <br /> formula this year, we would expect many counties to rescind the local <br /> option tax and the whole trust fund concept to collapse. However, <br /> there is a danger that some counties could act to rescind the tax, <br /> even if the legislature passes a new distribution formula which is <br /> satisfactory but not ideal from the county standpoint. In view of <br /> this hazard, I encourage city officials to take these actions: <br /> 1- Urge your legislator to support a new trust fund distribution <br /> formula which maintains the integrity of the trust fund. <br /> 2. Urge your county officials to continue to support the trust fund <br /> and the 1/2 cent local option tax, provided the legislature . <br /> passes any fairly reasonable trust fund distribution formula. Ask <br /> them to be careful that any resolution regarding rescinding the <br /> local option tax be applicable only in the event that no new <br /> distribution formula is passed in the 1992 session. <br /> 3. Point out to your county officials their action to rescind the <br /> local option tax could be negated by adoption of resolutions by <br /> the city councils and township boards having a majority of the <br /> county's population. <br /> This issue has such a potentially powerful impact on city finance that <br /> being forewarned is being forearmed. I encourage city officials most <br /> strongly to develop a contingency plan meeting such an event. I <br /> suggest you contemplate what actions your city would take and whether <br /> you might join with city councils representing a majority of the <br /> county's population to reverse any county government decision to <br /> revoke support of the 1/2 cent local optional sales tax. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.