My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-09-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 03-09-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:51 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:38:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular council Meeting, 2-10-92 <br /> Page 4 <br /> TILLER (Cont'd) Acting Mayor Malone stated the current interest rate is . <br /> 8% and the assessment is spread over 5 to 10 years. <br /> Kahnke also questioned why the project proposes concrete =b and gutter <br /> installation; noted the existing roadways in this area do not have concrete =b <br /> and gutter. <br /> Acting Mayor Malone explained that during discussions of proposed the assessment <br /> manual and reconstruction program council determined that all new developments <br /> require concrete =b and gutters and it was appropriate to require the <br /> installation of concrete =b and gutters as part of the reconstruction of the <br /> older streets in the city. He noted that during a proposed project in 1991, <br /> residents indicated they would prefer the con=ete =b and gutter. <br /> Forest Behr, 1234 Tiller Lane, questioned if the core samples were taken at <br /> different locations along the roadway surface. He questioned the purpose of the <br /> concrete =b and gutter installation on Tiller Lane. Behr pointed out that the <br /> economic conditions may have changed substantially since Council determined the <br /> standards outlined in the assessment manual. He commented that HaInline Avenue is <br /> in much worse condition than Tiller Lane; suggested the con=ete =b and gutter <br /> be deleted from this project and the monies saved be utilized to repair HaInline <br /> Avenue. <br /> Engineer Maurer explained core samples were taken at various locations along <br /> Tiller lane. He reiterated the surface of Tiller Lane will not hold a bituminous <br /> overlay. . <br /> Gary Abrahamson, 1228 Carlton Drive, stated he is the owner of the property <br /> adjacent to Tiller Lane and explained Carlton Drive was overruled in 1991; <br /> questioned why his property is listed as part of this project. <br /> Maurer advised his lot is located close to the project site and it is <br /> questionable at this time if the property will be included in the project. He <br /> noted this property will be reviewed and Council will make a determination <br /> regarding the property assessment at the scheduled assessment hearing. <br /> Wayne Bond, 1326 Tiller Lane, questioned if core samples were taken when Carlton <br /> Drive was overlaid. He stated if the core samples for Carlton are comparable to <br /> Tiller Lane, his preference would be to have Tiller overlaid. Bond further <br /> questioned if there were differences in the core samples taken from the westerly <br /> and easterly portions of Tiller Lane. <br /> Engineer Maurer explained =e samples are only taken during reconstruction of <br /> streets, not for bituminous overlay projects. <br /> Gene Ward, 1242 Tiller Lane, favored a bituminous overlay of Tiller Lane. <br /> Diana Ettel, 1249 Tiller Lane, expressed concern that the Oak trees bordering her <br /> property may became infected with Oak wilt if the project is completed pri= to <br /> July 15. She commented that if there are no plans to install concrete =b and <br /> gutter on adjoining streets over the next few years, the installation of such <br /> materials on Tiller lane would look out of place. . <br /> David Neuberger, 3330 Dunlap Street, stated his opposition to installation of <br /> concrete =b and gutter; does not appear it would be suitable f= the <br /> neighborhood since the other streets in the area do not have concrete =b and <br /> gutter. He questioned if bituminous overlay projects are assessed to property <br /> owners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.