My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-13-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 07-13-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:54 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> , <br /> . Arden Hills Council 5 June 29, 1992 <br /> Has Arden Hills considered a storm water utility such as <br /> other cities have adopted? <br /> Councilmember Malone stated that Council is in the process <br /> of considering a storm water utility, but such a program may <br /> not address this type of situation. <br /> Warren McGuire, 1553 Arden place: We were told when we <br /> purchased our property that the existing pipe drained. We <br /> have done some landscaping to our property and hauled in <br /> some fill which has actually improved the drainage problems <br /> being experienced by at the Noyed property at 3505 Ridgewood <br /> Road. (Dale Noyed nodded in agreement.) <br /> Brad Lis, 1548 Arden place: If the direct route option is <br /> used, I suggest some additional work such as culvert <br /> replacement. <br /> councilmember Malone asked Graham if placement of the pipe <br /> in the direct route option could be shifted somewhat. <br /> Engineer Graham said that bends in the pipe create problems, <br /> but minor realignment could be studied. Councilmember Growe <br /> asked if tree loss could be avoided if the placement were <br /> . shi fted. Graham said he would check, but reminded Council <br /> that an existing power pole and the limited construction <br /> path must also be considered. <br /> Councilmember Malone commented that it is clear the <br /> improvement needs to be done, however I questions relative to <br /> easements using either option must be answered prior to a <br /> decision. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to: <br /> 1 ) Direct the City Attorney to determine easement <br /> acquisition costs involved in addressing Arden <br /> place drainage problems using both of the options <br /> outlined by the City Engineer; <br /> 2 ) Report findings to Council for consideration at <br /> the July 20, 1992 Council worksession; <br /> 3) continue the Arden Place Improvement public <br /> hearing at the July 27, 1992 Council meeting. <br /> Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . <br /> Councilmember Malone advised the public that council's July <br /> 20 worksession is an open meeting. <br /> Council recessed briefly and reconvened. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.