Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Arden Hills Council 2 August 31, 1992 . <br /> roofline of the proposed building requiring a variance to <br /> 75' height. " Council agreed to this revision. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve the minutes <br /> of August 17, 1992 Regular Counci 1 Meeting with the <br /> above-noted revision to page seven. Motion carried <br /> unanimously (5-0) . <br /> CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> Councilmember Mahowald and Growe agreed to approve item "a" <br /> under Consent Calendar, but expressed interest in further <br /> discussing the item under "Council Comments". <br /> MOT ION : Hicks moved, seconded by Malone to approve the Consent <br /> calendar and authorize execution of all necessary <br /> documents contained therein. Motion carried <br /> unanimously (5-0). <br /> a. Accept resignation from Jerry Miller, Chair, <br /> Public Safety/Works Committee. <br /> b. Appointment of Additional Election Judge for the <br /> 1992 State Primary Election, <br /> c. Approval Final Pay Estimate #5 for 1991 North . <br /> Snelling Avenue Improvements. <br /> d. Approve Release of Collateral Held on City's <br /> Behalf from Norwest Bank. <br /> e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENTS <br /> (continued from July 20 & ,June 29, 1992) <br /> Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:40 p.m. for the purpose <br /> of continuing a public hearing (from July 20 and June 29, <br /> 1992) on Keithson Pond Assessments. Acting Clerk <br /> Administrator Iago verified remailing of notices to affected <br /> property o'wners on July 30, 1992. <br /> Reviewing background, City Engineer Graham recalled that <br /> estimated assessments ror the proposed Keithson Pond project <br /> were presented at the June 29 and July 20 assessment <br /> hearings, where affected residents were given the <br /> opportunity to register their objections. <br /> Graham added that on July 20, Council: . <br /> 1) Based on the opinion of the City appraiser, established <br /> a maximum supportable per lot assessment of $1,500; and <br /> 2 ) Based on the opinion of the City Engineer after review <br /> of the topography of the areal determined which <br />